At the risk of getting Clintonian with the language, I meant to say that if Westerfield is convicted (I'm not talking about "guilty" or "not guilty" but "convicted" or "acquitted") at this particular trial, with this particular jury, then I challenge his sympathizers to make a donation to FR. To put their money where their mouths are. I will make a donation if he is acquitted.
You obviously haven't read every single post on FR about this. If you did there is no way a sane person would conclude DW is guilty. < /sarcasm>