Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: contessa machiaveli
she was naked, that certainly indicates a sexual motive.

There was also no indication of truma, or evidence that she was bound with rope or anything else. Exactly how did he keep that girl so quiet and out of his hair as he traveled around the country side? How did the rape of a 7 year old girl leave so little evidence? He did not bleach or steam clean his motor home as the media loves to report. He didn't even wipe it down.

69 posted on 08/07/2002 8:36:11 PM PDT by Dave_in_Upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Dave_in_Upland; All
This thought just came to me:

Danielle was theoretically abducted with her pjs on. At least that's what Brenda claims. She even displayed a duplicate pair that was supposedly worn by Danielle's little friend during sleepovers.

If DW abducted her, wouldn't pj fibers be present in DW's home, RV, or MH that would match the identical pair Brenda described?

92 posted on 08/07/2002 9:30:49 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Dave_in_Upland; contessa machiaveli
I have often wondered if the pj's were removed because they either had DNA of the perp or traces of drugs. There is after all the unID'd DNA on her blanket.
105 posted on 08/07/2002 10:21:13 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson