Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: contessa machiaveli
you are reaching - no PJ's could mean simply that her clothing was removed because they may/may not have contained evidence. Or maybe she never had pj's on at all - all we have are the parents word as to what she supposedly wore that night. And no pj's were ever found.
59 posted on 08/07/2002 8:26:26 PM PDT by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: CAPPSMADNESS
And why were the clothes she wore that day, not found on the floor with the pj's?....couldn't be cuz that is what she was wearing when she left the house...not those pj's with cascading flowers??
72 posted on 08/07/2002 8:39:04 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: CAPPSMADNESS
And no pj's were ever found.

So he disposed of the PJs but kept the jacket with her blood on it?

129 posted on 08/08/2002 2:26:47 AM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson