To: nina0113
Regardless of the jury verdict, a conviction will be reversed on appeal because a guilty verdict simply cannot be supported by the evidence. The inability of the bug experts to come up with even a possible explanation for the lack of bug activity that could justify a dumping date to early February. This, more than anything, would force me to say not guilty. Damon's suggestion to search closer to town and his trip to the dessert on 2/16, the date Faulkner suggested as the date the body was dumped would lead me to believe that Damon, more than DW, should be on trial.
Damon must realize that if DW is found 'not guilty', the police will have to start looking at other suspects, and he is the obvious choice.
To: connectthedots
Unforunately, no they won't. They will dismiss it as a stupid jury. And David's life, well it has already been ruined. If for some twisted reason they found that the hair under the body matched, say Avila's do you really think that news would make the light of day? I don't.
420 posted on
08/08/2002 10:46:34 AM PDT by
Jaded
To: connectthedots
Hi CTD...I've enjoyed your smart and cogent comments on these threads. I haven't been able to follow the case closely, but my sense is that jury will find DW guilty. I agree, DVD is more likely suspect, however. WE shall see, and perhaps soon.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson