I don't see how, in your normal reasonable fashion, you find that a case of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt has been made here. It hasn't.
I'm not certain at all that a
"case of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt has been made here." I don't think I've commented at all on Dusek's performance or his presentation of evidence. [For the record, I was unimpressed.]
All I'm certain of is, I think Westerfield did it, and I hope the jury agrees. As for the petty insults coming my way because of that opinion? Not a problem.