Skip to comments.
Defense Feldman: Danielle Van Dam Knew Her Abductor: Dusek, Still Talking...Westerfield Waiting
Union Trib ^
| August 8, 2002
| Steve Perez/Greg Magnus
Posted on 08/07/2002 7:08:12 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 481-498 next last
To: Mrs.Liberty
Cranberry vodkas all around.
401
posted on
08/08/2002 10:32:51 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: FresnoDA
Thanks to you also for all the work you have put in to make these threads informative and interesting.
You also are greatly appreciated.
To: Mrs.Liberty; connectthedots
Well, we should meet up at Dad's. I agree...Dad's would be very appropriate. And as far as loser's pay, the DW haters would have a heftier bar tab.
403
posted on
08/08/2002 10:35:16 AM PDT
by
nycgal
To: UCANSEE2
When the FBI had to investigate itself and found that the FBI was doing nothing wrong, did you believe them ?You are confused as to who brings a prosecution a case. Its not the FBI, its a politally appointed ladder climber that doesn't want to take any chances and therefore he isn't going to stick his head out and take a case he isn't guaranteed to win.
To: shezza; FresnoDA; spectre; ~Kim4VRWC's~
Thanks to all of you for your keeping this cube bound FReeper informed, entertained, and (occaisionally) horrified!
405
posted on
08/08/2002 10:36:24 AM PDT
by
L,TOWM
To: shezza
Cranberry vodkas all around along with a Red Bull booster .. and free doobies in the parking lot.
To: crystalk
Danielle already seems to have died in their minds...Very good point. I got that same impression from their behavior Saturday morning, with Damon's "Oh well, we still have the two boys to raise" and their utter lack of worry. But it might have started on Friday.
To: contessa machiaveli
i really believe westerfield is guilty and the jury will as well. the absolute clincher for me is the indisputable fact that danielle's blood was found on the right hand side shoulder of westerfields' jacket.It was not proven to be blood. It was 'presumed' to be blood. The DNA test matched 12 out of 13 markers. The expert said a PERFECT MATCH means that a DNA sample would only match 1 out of a jillion. What the expert DIDN'T SAY is that 12 out of 13 does not constitute a PERFECT MATCH.
i haven't allowed my emotions to cloud my opinion...it's the facts m'am.
We all allow emotions to cloud our opinions, if you can't admit that, you are not human. BTW, it is SIR, not MA'AM.
and BTW, i hardly approve of the van damme's lifestyle but at most they were negligent and they'll feel guilty for that as long as they live.
Who cares about the VD's lifestyle? I only care that they ignored their child BEFORE AND AFTER her disappearance.
BUT, westerfield did murder the child...and he must pay.
Well, once again, you have concluded DW did it, because of what the media feeds you. You too, are on the BLOODLUST, WE MUST HAVE A SACRIFICE list.
How would you feel, if Brenda burst through the crowd and SHOT DW?
Fine. I know what you must be thinking about that.
NOW, how would you feel if the next day, the SD DA announced that in the films confiscated from the CHILD PORN RING that they just arrested people for (1) on JAN 27th, (2) on Feb 18th (gee, isn't that just a few days after Feldman said that someone dumped the body of Danielle at Dehesa Rd.) that one film contained scenes of the number (2) guy and Damon and his friend from Florida gang raping Danielle. WHAT WOULD YOU THINK THEN?
BTW, have you seen what was alledgedly in DANIELLE's DIARY? The one she was writing in for HOURS according to Brenda and Damon ?
Would you like to know ?
To: crystalk
Danielle already seems to have died in their minds,"I forgot to add to your post:
... and they were OK with that.
To: Rheo
Thank you Rheo, for having all the info cataloged in your brain, so any time you were asked a question, you could recall it in a snap of a finger. You are truly amazing, and I appreciated you taking the time to answer my questions.
And did you have a GREAT TIME on vacation??????
To: shezza
Don't forget the never ending pizza and Maui-Waui!!!
411
posted on
08/08/2002 10:41:15 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: nina0113
Regardless of the jury verdict, a conviction will be reversed on appeal because a guilty verdict simply cannot be supported by the evidence. The inability of the bug experts to come up with even a possible explanation for the lack of bug activity that could justify a dumping date to early February. This, more than anything, would force me to say not guilty. Damon's suggestion to search closer to town and his trip to the dessert on 2/16, the date Faulkner suggested as the date the body was dumped would lead me to believe that Damon, more than DW, should be on trial.
Damon must realize that if DW is found 'not guilty', the police will have to start looking at other suspects, and he is the obvious choice.
To: nycgal
One last question: Don't you have to believe Westerfield kidnapped Danielle to make everything work for a guilty verdict? To me, the fact no one ever proved Westerfield was in the vD house is a big stumbling block to believing he killed Danielle.
413
posted on
08/08/2002 10:41:48 AM PDT
by
BARLF
To: Steve0113
Well, the forensic anthropoligist could provide the data to substantiate that. lol
To: UCANSEE2
I hope and pray after the verdict is read, that YOU will continue with your investigation into this case. So much has been excluded from this case.
I'm going to take a shower (for real) now, get out of the house, do some errands and hope the VERDICT will wait till I come home...LOL!
sw
415
posted on
08/08/2002 10:43:53 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: nycgal
I agree...Dad's would be very appropriate. And as far as loser's pay, the DW haters would have a heftier bar tab. At least pizza is cheap.
To: spectre
Dusek using the "F" word again today..Du-dick used the F word in front of the jury???
To: nycgal
So if Danielle wasn't wearing them, where are they? That is the question we have asked on these threads since the beginning. PROSECUTION says that DW must have picked them up and carried them with him and Danielle just because he wanted more fiber evidence spread around to make sure he got caught.
To: pinz-n-needlez
Well, the forensic anthropoligist could provide the data to substantiate that. lolNo doubt.
NOT.
To: connectthedots
Unforunately, no they won't. They will dismiss it as a stupid jury. And David's life, well it has already been ruined. If for some twisted reason they found that the hair under the body matched, say Avila's do you really think that news would make the light of day? I don't.
420
posted on
08/08/2002 10:46:34 AM PDT
by
Jaded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 481-498 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson