Skip to comments.
Westerfield Closings Set For Tuesday, 8-6-2002: More Revelations Continue "Out" Of Jurors Sight!
Court TV ^
| August 6, 2002
| Harriet Ryan
Posted on 08/06/2002 6:40:14 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880 ... 1,061-1,065 next last
To: Lucky
"the court wouldn't let her answer."
And this was wrong, wrong, wrong! On the court's part. Yet, the judge is giving DW a "fair trial". Well, if that's true, and the call could have exonerated DW, then why wasn't it allowed to be discussed in court? It must have been damaging to the vdams or else it would have been allowed.
That phone call has been driving me nuts!
To: KnutCase
For a knutcase you are making perfect sense. Even for a non-knutcase!
To: the Deejay
Who knows, maybe Feldman is acting disorganized on purpose. It seems to be humoring the jury.I heard parts of the closing argument and he did sound disjointed, but to me it sounded like someone who has so much to say that the thoughts are tumbling out too fast for his brain to put words to them. (it happens to me a lot LOL)
But it could also be a very effective ploy, starting strong, then getting a little confused just before a long break (while making some very strong points that will stick in the juror's minds when they think of how he was acting) and then in the morning going back over those points in a more collected manner.
To: nycgal
Right, if suffocated, there wouldn't be any blood. None.
And Dusek implying she was raped, tortured and killed on the bed of the RV, as if he witnessed it himself, just had me moaning in disgust at the nerve of him.
To: sawsalimb
First, the porn was also on cd's and zip disks.
Second, Westerfield had a work folder for his company in My Documents and in a sub-folder in that work folder were the "attack" videos that he did later delete. But he devised a folder for them and also they were able to determine that each video was watched at least once and some up to five times on Media Player.
Akin to Dusek pointing out today that Neal would hardly hide "his own" porn cd's and zip disks in his father's work space, Neal also would not hide those kind of videos in a sub-folder of his father's computer work folder.
To: the Deejay
It's driving me nuts too. We just want the truth. The parents look so guilty. I hope Feldman can slip in some more information.
846
posted on
08/06/2002 5:41:41 PM PDT
by
Lucky
To: the Deejay
Maybe it would mean that the DA and police would have to go back to square one and start over.. and one of them said, "Aw shucks, not again. This is getting monotonous....every case?...I'm tired, let's get on with this...no going back now." Plausible??
To: Dave_in_Upland
I do believe Feldman is a much more keen and polished attorney than Dusek will ever be. It was so difficult to
try and follow him today. He was all over the place with his closing argument. Very disorganized indeed.
To: nycgal
The parents' bedroom is to the right of the stairs. To the left of the stairs are the kids' roomsThanks for the info. So the person wouldn't have gone right by Damon's room.
849
posted on
08/06/2002 5:43:52 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: nycgal
You would think that when LE found the spot of blood on the floor of the MH and thought DW had cleaned up the evidence, they would haved used luminol, because the blood would have shown up, even if he tried to clean it.
850
posted on
08/06/2002 5:44:28 PM PDT
by
gigi
To: Lauratealeaf
Thanx.....first compliment I've had today'
To: connectthedots
the story may go national.Let me know if it does.
852
posted on
08/06/2002 5:44:55 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: KnutCase
Well, I don't know if it's plausible, but hey! There's a man's life on the line. There has been little more evidence to come in since the prelim. Including the suspect phone call on the 16th. to the vdams.
To: Spunky
"So the person wouldn't have gone right by Damon's room."
No, but it sure would have been a chancey thing to do, because Damon's door was open & the tv was on. I will
always contend this was an inside job.
To: KnutCase
Am I making sense yet???I sure hope that is what this was all about.
I did hear Feldman's wife was in the audiance for the first time. Also heard that Westerfields sister and someone else were there, but I can't remember the relationship to Westerfield. Nephew I think?
855
posted on
08/06/2002 5:51:23 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: the Deejay
He was disorganized, but he did explain to the Jury that Dusek's "playing on their emotions" upset him. He said some of their reactions made him nervous.
I also liked that he pointed out the Prosecution brought the VD's lifestyle not him, and if they hadn't the judge would never let him bring it up.
856
posted on
08/06/2002 5:52:51 PM PDT
by
gigi
To: the Deejay
Well, the big evidence is that the body was dumped after DW was on 24/7 watch.
857
posted on
08/06/2002 5:53:16 PM PDT
by
Lucky
To: Spunky
I do believe DW's family members don't want any reporters snapping their photos for print, as one slag had done to Neal. And I think that's why they haven't been in the court-room during the trial. They don't want to be exploited. (I can't blame them.)
However, I did read where they all visit him on a regular basis at the jail. Ex-wife, kids & all, every visiting day.
To: Lucky
"Well, the big evidence is that the body was dumped after DW was on 24/7 watch."
That's very true. And Dusek implied, today, that the entomologists were "corrupt". How indignant can one get?
Bugs and their infestations cannot lie, nor be "corrupt", either.
To: the Deejay
They were also under subpoena and gag.
860
posted on
08/06/2002 5:59:20 PM PDT
by
Jaded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880 ... 1,061-1,065 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson