Posted on 08/06/2002 6:40:14 AM PDT by FresnoDA
Westerfield closings set for Tuesday |
![]() |
||||||
|
|||||||
SAN DIEGO After two months and 116 witnesses, jurors in the capital murder case of David Westerfield will hear closing arguments Tuesday. "We'll be ready to rock and roll tomorrow morning," Judge William Mudd told lawyers Monday. Defense attorneys for Westerfield, who is accused of kidnapping and killing his 7-year-old neighbor Danielle van Dam, had considered calling a forensic anthropologist as their final witness. After weekend discussions, however, they decided to rest their case, defense lawyer Steven Feldman told Mudd. The judge imposed no time limits on the arguments Feldman and prosecutor Jeff Dusek will make, and closings in the trial, which included 199 exhibits and weeks of complex forensic testimony, could stretch into a second day. At the hearing Monday, Feldman made yet another attempt to have the panel of six men and six women sequestered during deliberations. He cited front page articles about the case in the local paper as well as an article about swinging in San Diego magazine. "The land mines keep growing, Judge," he told Mudd. As he had before, the judge denied the request and said he trusted the jury to follow his instructions about avoiding media accounts of the case. Westerfield, 50, faces the death penalty if convicted of Danielle's slaying. The second-grader was abducted from her bedroom last February. Searchers found her naked body on the side of a road three and a half weeks later. Prosecutors claim Westerfield sexually assaulted and suffocated her, but the defense says forensic evidence indicates she was dumped after the defendant was under police surveillance. |
|
Did they not arrest him for murder before she was found? He is correct.
Oh, now dusek is going into "getting rid of the evidence," like the black cowboy boots.
Van Dams are wondering "where is my child?"...abit late, huh Dusek..they didn't give a crap the night she disappeared to check on her, you piece of cow manure.
NOW he says "Westerfield TRIES to BLAME HIS SON"...have a heart attack, Dusek, you sorry excuse for a human being.
w
And please accept my humble apologies for cutting out this morning. We'll be back in a couple of hours, though, which will be after the lunch break, and I'll pay my penance then.
This doesn't mean much, since we all have different lengths of hair on our head merely from the fact that different strands are in different growth phases. The short hairs, for this reason, could have been shed before or after a haircut.
That was to rebut Feldman's case. They did try to blame the son.
You missed Judge Mudd's instructions and Dusek's case.
They know DW killed Danielle because he kidnapped her (prints,hair in MH). They know DW kidnapped Danielle because he killed her (she is dead).
Judge Mudd told the jury, IF he kidnapped her, then he killed her that is how you must find. If he killed her, then he kidnapped her, that is how you must find.
Feldman asked the Judge to at least have the idea that their should be a motive, some explanation of INTENT to KILL, and Judge Mudd said NO.
Everything Dusek wanted, Judge Mudd said "sure thing sweety".
Might as well be "THE SPANISH INQUISITION".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.