Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westerfield Closings Set For Tuesday, 8-6-2002: More Revelations Continue "Out" Of Jurors Sight!
Court TV ^ | August 6, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 08/06/2002 6:40:14 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Westerfield closings set for Tuesday

Photo
The defense for David Westerfield, left, opted not to call a last forensic witness, clearing the way for closing arguments Tuesday morning.

SAN DIEGO — After two months and 116 witnesses, jurors in the capital murder case of David Westerfield will hear closing arguments Tuesday.

"We'll be ready to rock and roll tomorrow morning," Judge William Mudd told lawyers Monday.

Defense attorneys for Westerfield, who is accused of kidnapping and killing his 7-year-old neighbor Danielle van Dam, had considered calling a forensic anthropologist as their final witness. After weekend discussions, however, they decided to rest their case, defense lawyer Steven Feldman told Mudd.

The judge imposed no time limits on the arguments Feldman and prosecutor Jeff Dusek will make, and closings in the trial, which included 199 exhibits and weeks of complex forensic testimony, could stretch into a second day.

At the hearing Monday, Feldman made yet another attempt to have the panel of six men and six women sequestered during deliberations. He cited front page articles about the case in the local paper as well as an article about swinging in San Diego magazine.

"The land mines keep growing, Judge," he told Mudd.

As he had before, the judge denied the request and said he trusted the jury to follow his instructions about avoiding media accounts of the case.

Westerfield, 50, faces the death penalty if convicted of Danielle's slaying. The second-grader was abducted from her bedroom last February. Searchers found her naked body on the side of a road three and a half weeks later. Prosecutors claim Westerfield sexually assaulted and suffocated her, but the defense says forensic evidence indicates she was dumped after the defendant was under police surveillance.

 
Comprehensive case coverage


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,061-1,065 next last
Comment #121 Removed by Moderator

To: shezza
Consider qualifications and believability of expert witnesses when their opinions differ.
122 posted on 08/06/2002 9:31:44 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

Reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt.
123 posted on 08/06/2002 9:31:52 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
(That's about par, bass!)
124 posted on 08/06/2002 9:32:11 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I'd like to know who she's playing "hide the sausage" with over there at CTV. In all seriousness, she's one of the dumbest people I've ever seen as a TV anchorperson. There's nothing more disgusting as a middle aged woman trying to act "cute".
125 posted on 08/06/2002 9:33:30 AM PDT by the-gooroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Defendent is assumed to be innocent until guilt is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Counts 2 & 3, kidnapping of child under 14 and porn under 18, requires general criminal intent.

Count 1: Murder. Must contain specific intent in mind of perpetrator. Unless specific intent is present, the crime is not true. (???)

126 posted on 08/06/2002 9:35:01 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Special circumstance: "Murder of DVD was committed by DAW while said defendent was engaged in crime of kidnapping." People have burden of proving the truth of this special circumstance. If you have a reasonable doubt that this has been proven, you must not convict.
127 posted on 08/06/2002 9:40:44 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I think it was at Cheerleader U. Pompoms, flips and occasionally a look at lawbooks.

LOL! Maybe this was her cheer: "Fiddly faddly fuss. We're not allowed to cuss. But Damn it to hell. We might as well. They're beating the sh*t out of us."

128 posted on 08/06/2002 9:41:33 AM PDT by Lauratealeaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: shezza
What a mush mush of instructions in #120. They are simply not facts unless there is proof. No proof, then it is not a fact.
129 posted on 08/06/2002 9:42:13 AM PDT by Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Sheeza, just wanted to let you know you do a great job!
130 posted on 08/06/2002 9:42:25 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Prayer bump.
131 posted on 08/06/2002 9:42:28 AM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Special circumstance must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt...before an inference may be considered to be true, each theory upon which that inference rests must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If there are two reasonable interpretations, must be considered to point toward innocence. If one interpretation is reasonable and one is unreasonable, must accept interpretation which is reasonable.
132 posted on 08/06/2002 9:45:22 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: shezza
I think he also said that murder1 during a kidnapping did not require intent....
133 posted on 08/06/2002 9:45:39 AM PDT by clearvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Penalty or punishment must not be discussed or considered.
134 posted on 08/06/2002 9:45:42 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
In order to get a fair trial we should think the murder of Danielle is kinda cool and deserving ?


What a stupid thing to say.
135 posted on 08/06/2002 9:45:54 AM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lauratealeaf
Hey, I used to work for Regis!! LOL!
136 posted on 08/06/2002 9:46:05 AM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Muchas gracias. Fuzzy feed.
137 posted on 08/06/2002 9:46:08 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Is there a pool for how long it will take the jury to reach a verdict?
138 posted on 08/06/2002 9:46:46 AM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Kidnapping is more than a slight or trivial distance...must consider distance, movement, whether movement increased harm or decreased likelihood of intention, reduced likelihood of escape...

Must be proved: person was restrained; movement was without person's consent; movement was considerable distance; movement commenced when person was still alive.

139 posted on 08/06/2002 9:48:03 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: winodog
Also if the low is 30 or 32 degrees the insides of a body will freeze

That should read will not freeze unless the temp remains for a long period of time. In other words at least 24 hours.

140 posted on 08/06/2002 9:48:12 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,061-1,065 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson