Defendant (Westerfield) Now Lives A Spartan Existence: Nothing Left But To Fight For His Life!!

Union Tribune ^ | August 5, 2002 | Kristen Green

[Politicalmom]

Yes. They had been DELETED!!!

[Freedom2specul8]

Not on the cd's... G'nite!

[pyx]

A THERE IS ATTACK 01, BABY 010, ASS RAPE 1, ATTACK 02, ATTACK 03, ATTACK 04, ATTACK 05, ATTACK 06, ATTACK 07, ATTACK 08, ATTACK 09, ATTACK 010. "

Telling isn't it.

Yes it is telling. Are you asking ?

When someone downloads MULTIPART binary files, they often downloaded as parts and 'reassembled' into one file. The attack files seem to have EXACTLY that sort of structure as being a MULTIPART binary download from a Usenet News thread. Now I have no idea what Usenet Newsgroup DAW or his son Neal or anyone else at the websites they visited subscribed to, but there is a lot of this sort of rubbish being posted and spam cross-posted on many different Usenet Newsgroups.

In fact, I've seen exactly this sort of MULTIPART structure on the Usenet Newsgroups I've read such as povray.animations others cross-posted to povray.binaries.images and povray.binaries.scene-files

Oh, and just to show how REAL some computer generated animations are, you might wanna check out here and then run some of his very fine "test" animations. I particularly recommend May 25, 2002 Blow-up and November 5, 2001 Spider. And yes, Rune's ingenious work was totally created inside his PC (minus an arial photo in the Blow-up). Can we trust anything we see on tee vee news anymore ? Just imagine, there are 10's if not 100's of thousands of people all over the world using free software like Povray as a hobby tool to create, goodness knows what sort of animations and stills in the privacy of their own homes.

Meanwhile, back to the Westerfield trial, if anyone really wants to check around, they can will find on some other completely different web pages, some pretty sexually explicit modelling and very real appearing animations.

[dread78645]

"A THERE IS ATTACK 01 ... ATTACK 08, ATTACK 09, ATTACK 010. "

When someone downloads MULTIPART binary files, they often downloaded as parts and 'reassembled' into one file. The attack files seem to have EXACTLY that sort of structure as being a MULTIPART binary download from a Usenet News thread.

That's what it looks like to me. Watkins didn't mention finding the completed 'ATTACK.MPEG', so did he re-assemble the parts ?

[John Jamieson]

Being married to Mormon, although not one myself, and raising 6 Mormon kids for the last 15 years, I'd sure like to know the "secrets". So far I'll all I've been able to figure is that they are human, slightly more controlled in thier beliefs and actions, and all around nice people. They are also extremely tolerant of others. But that's just my experience.

[CAPPSMADNESS]

OFFICIAL DW TRIAL THREAD GLOSSARY

These definitions are about the funniest things I have ever read - but they need to be followed up by Jaded's big, bright chant........

[bvw]

Was the attack video shown in the opening one of the videos that was viewed mulitple times, or any at all? And why did the prosecutor limit the response, telling the expert to respond "WITHOUT GIVING THE NUMBER OF TIMES FOR EACH ONE"? And could Neil have been the one who (1) downloaded these, or (2) viewed them repeatedly?

In the end, porno is not murder, and it is NOT circumstantial evidence to it. Do you realise that character witnesses were NOT allowed, yet the rape vidoes -- which speak only (and circumstantially, btw) to character -- were? This theory that viewing the rape videos produced some sort of compulsion to abduction and murder is ridiculous, and has no support in expert psychological testimony, in witness testimony, or in the computer forensic evidence expert's testimony which puts the last known date of viewing back in November. Further the files WERE deleted -- not cherished. The Judge should have never allowed these videos to be presented in evidence, and the showing of the rape video during opening was an egregiously prejudicial action that irrecoverably tainted the jury.

[spectre]

Imagine my horror this morning, when Fox showed our President, GW Bush giving a live statement on the rights of little children in this country.

What struck me light a bolt of lightening, was his reference to Danielle van Dam and Samantha Runion. He said that Brenda Van Dam had called Mrs. Runion to express her sympathy and concern. Bush wants justice for all these little children, which in and of itself is a GOOD thing, but the President coming out expressing his concern for these two cases, doesn't do much for Westerfield...

JUDGE MUDD!!

sw

[John Jamieson]

Interestingly. K. Crier made the comment yesterday that the prosecution couldn't care less about what happens to the porno charge, as it has already served it's purpose.

[EllaMinnow]

If you go here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/08/20020806.html

you can watch the video of President Bush's speech this morning - where he not only mentions Danielle, but he quotes Brenda van Dam.

[bvw]

Did Mr. Bush quote Brenda's admittal to sex-swapping, or just her excitement at going to lesbo bars in SF with her girlfriends?

[bvw]

Mr. Bush has wined and dinned such killers of young girls as Teddy Kennedy too.

[spectre]

Never thought I'd be "thanking" you, but I am, so thank you.

Here we have the President of the United States calling this case a deplorable situation, and if THAT isn't enough to put the pressure on the Jury, I don't know what is?!!

This should be a MISTRIAL...because Judge Mudd miscalculated the exposure the jury would have to the media.

But I doubt he will EVEN sequester them.

This is awful.

sw

[FresnoDA]

8-6-02 Thread

Westerfield Closings Set For Tuesday, 8-6-2002: More Revelations Continue "Out" Of Jurors Sight!

[Jaded]

yeah, I read that yesterday from the UT site.

[Jaded]

It's in the transcripts, others have read it as well.

[Jaded]

Read the transcript......the whole thing.

[Jaded]

They really don't want to know nor do they care. It's the Dusek shock value, whether it's relevant or not.

Then again the defendant or son viewed the clips in NOVEMEBER and waited 77 days to act on them. All they can do in response to that shriek about their existence and not the relevance. Talk about your post traumatic stress and delayed reaction...

[Jaded]

jes fer u

**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**

and one fer pyx....

**FREE HAZMAT DAVE**FREE HAZMAT DAVE**FREE HAZMAT DAVE**

Prayer for the jury is up.....Stealth Ninja Dave

[tdhjohnsmom]

I'm a long-time lurker, first-time poster.

This case has grabbed my attention from the beginning. Danielle seems personal to me, perhaps because I have a grandaughter that is exactly 10 days younger than Danielle. After reading the many opinions and theories posted here, and considering the testimony and evidence presented at trial, I have concluded that (1) there is a multitude of reasonable doubt as to the guilt of DW, and (2) DVD makes my skin crawl. There is something very dark and "creepy" about that man.

I wanted to come out of lurkdom to say that I will be praying that all of the sloppy and selective police work, and the seeming bias of the media and the bench will be overcome so that justice will prevail for Danielle.