What do your comments have to do with my post and facts???
It's not that I want it "my way", it's that I understand how certain testimony can be presented to a jury. The jury in this trial is free to take the fact that these fibers are similar to each other and conclude that is evidence that DW had Danielle with him that weekend.
(In addition to the other evidence, of course)
That is the final summation of Dusek. Dusek will try to say they are the same. However, Feldy will conteract that the testimony was "not a match" Again CHeck and Check mate!
Dusek will have to be very careful to stay within the testamony or find himself in contempt. That is why I believe DW may be quilty but the DA has not proven his case in court. Not very well played. Sacraficed his queen to no avail!