Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
Your interpretation is incorrect. From the cross-exam by Feldman Jennifer Shen states:

A. WELL, I THINK THE FIBER CERTAINLY COULD HAVE BEEN THERE FOR AS LONG AS THE BODY WAS IN ITS RESTING LOCATION. THINK IT'S UNLIKELY THE FIBER WAS THERE FOR MUCH PRIOR TO THAT BECAUSE IT WAS TANGLED IN SUCH A LARGE WAD OF HAIR ON THE NECKLACE.

Now, read that carefully. The fiber "was tangled in such a large wad of hair on the necklace."

It is very clear.

524 posted on 07/31/2002 6:47:22 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
UCANSEE2 bid us all a goodnight & won't be back with us until tomorrow. Post 509.
526 posted on 07/31/2002 6:49:53 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson