Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama
Hoosiermama I'll just point this out in what you think the fiber testimony should be.

One of the lawyers brought out from the fiber witness that he could pluck a fiber from his jacket right there and have her analyze it and the MOST she could say is that the fiber was similar to the fibers in his jacket.

That is the limitation placed on them by the court!

Then common sense takes over and the jury gets to add two and two.

516 posted on 07/31/2002 6:35:25 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
Cyn I know you want it your way, BUT that's what the instructions to the jury includes. NO common sense JUST THE FACTS MAM! NO maybe if. ... No why didn't he tell us.... Decision based on the Facts "presented in COurt".

If you didn't do that at your trial you are in "contempt of court" If the defendant was found quilty and you admitted to that, he could be set free. I do not remember the legal term right now. It's latin. Be careful what you say in public about your trial.
521 posted on 07/31/2002 6:41:54 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson