[UCANSEE2]

6 A. WELL, I KNOW THAT THE MAJORITY OF NYLON THAT IS7 PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES IS CARPET, AND THAT ABOUT TEN TO8 18 PERCENT IS APPAREL. AND IF THIS IS AN APPAREL FIBER -- IT'S9 DEFINITELY NOT A CARPET FIBER. IF IT'S AN APPAREL FIBER, THEN10 IT COULD BE RELATIVELY COMMON, YES.

Cyn, you keep qouting this. FIRST, her argument goes this way:

If it's not a rock it's an elephant. If it's not an elephant,it's a rock, and they are pretty common.

So, either it is or is not apparel or carpet fiber. And if it IS NOT CARPET FIBER, then it is too common to prove anything at all.

POOF, you now have argued a point which ends up proving absolutely nothing whatsoever. Do you see ?

[cyncooper]

No, I don't agree. She seems to state definitively that it is NOT CARPET.

She says nylon is relatively common as an apparel fiber.

She does not know the source of the fiber.

I say:

The fibers at DW's house and in the MH are similar to the fibers on Danielle van Dam's body---a body that did not have clothes to retain fibers. So how did the fibers get on and around Danielle and in Westerfield's home and motorhome?

As VRWC_minion points out, DW would have showered and changed clothes in his house before driving to the MH. So how did fibers "transfer" from his house to the MH?

How are the fibers around Danielle?