[John Jamieson]

I agree, and judging from the background change on the right side the red/orange has been turned way up on the right side to make the colors match!

[ItsOurTimeNow]

Again, prosecution trying to connect dots that aren't even there.

[small_l_libertarian]

Thanks, guys. It's good to know it's not just my eyes.

[Bluebird Singing]

Holy cow, I think you're right - that explains the difference in the background color. Highly suspicious (I'm really thinking deceitful, leaning towards evil)!

[clearvision]

I'm not sure if it was confirmed, but it seems the photo's were from a split microscope in June 25th Shen testimony:

YES, I CAN. THIS IS A PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN ON A COMPARISON MICROSCOPE. AND A COMPARISON MICROSCOPE IS SIMPLY TWO COMPOUND MICROSCOPES STUCK TOGETHER WITH ONE LIGHT BRIDGE SO YOU CAN ACTUALLY LOOK THROUGH ONE EYEPIECE AND YOU CAN SEE THE FIELD OF TWO SEPARATE MICROSCOPES AT THE SAME TIME. SO WHAT WE CAN DO IS PUT AN UNKNOWN FIBER ON ONE MICROSCOPE AND THE KNOWN FIBER ON THE OTHER MICROSCOPE, LOOK THROUGH THE ONE EYEPIECE AND SEE THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME, LINE THEM RIGHT UP TO EACH OTHER AND LOOK AT ALL THOSE VISUAL AND OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS SIDE BY SIDE TO MAKE SURE THAT IN FACT THEY ARE THE SAME. AND THIS IS MUCH MORE EFFICIENT THAN PUTTING ONE FIBER ON A MICROSCOPE THEN TAKING IT OFF AND PUTTING THE NEXT ONE ON BECAUSE YOU CAN'T SEE THEM RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER. SO THESE ARE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN ON A COMPARISON MICROSCOPE.Q: I THINK THERE'S A POINTER. IF THERE ISN'T, I CAN SEE ONE IN FRONT OF THE WITNESS STAND. IF YOU WOULD GO AHEAD AND TELL US WHAT'S SHOWN IN THESE TWO PHOTOGRAPHS ON EXHIBIT 134 IN TERMS OF THE COMPARISON THAT YOU CONDUCTED. A: PHOTOGRAPH A IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE FIBER TAKEN FROM THE NECKLACE AND THE FIBER TAKEN FROM ITEM 5A, WHICH IS ONE OF THE ITEMS OUT OF THE LAUNDRY FROM THE WASHING MACHINE. AND THIS IS TAKEN AT A 100-TIME MAGNIFICATION.