[bolthead]

Goff made the four calculations, two for Singing Hills and two for Brown Field. Then, before being cross-examined, he essentially said that the Singing Hills calcs were worthless because of only having max and min readings and of having to utilize a median. Of the Brown Field calcs he further stated, before being cross-examined that the 16.1C calc, which has a start date of 9 Feb, was the best.

His numbers were + or - one day. Thus his best calculation shows an earliest date of 8 Feb, while Haskell's earliest date was 12 Feb. I fail to see how adding four days to Haskell's earliest time actually helps the prosecution that much.

And as noted, this is still before cross-examination.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Of the Brown Field calcs he further stated, before being cross-examined that the 16.1C calc, which has a start date of 9 Feb, was the best.

His numbers were + or - one day. Thus his best calculation shows an earliest date of 8 Feb, while Haskell's earliest date was 12 Feb. I fail to see how adding four days to Haskell's earliest time actually helps the prosecution that much.

Bingo bump