Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smart Case, July 30, 2002
07/30/02 | Jolly Green

Posted on 07/29/2002 10:08:58 PM PDT by Jolly Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: Iwo Jima
5. The mastermind is a "respected member of the community" who sees himself as being so important and beyond reproach in his world that he acutally believed that he could do this and get away with it. He may or may not have a connection or relation to the family, but I believe that Elizabeth knew and respected him.

I know that you don't like to have hard facts get in the way of your theory, but the quote from police never said "respected member of the community" and it never said "trusted member of the community". MadisonA provided the following on the July 25th thread:

I think the exact quote by Atkinson on June 19th is "We believe that this person may be a trusted person in the neighborhood or in the community. [It] might be someone ... that had reason to be here, that had reason to come across the family, all those kind of things we still believe,"

The quote provides a far wider interpretation than the incorrect "member of the community" you are assuming to be the case. Ricci fits nicely into the interpretation of the exact quote without any assistance from a Mr. Big neighbor.

22 posted on 07/30/2002 10:57:29 AM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
You are frantically grapsing at starws. There is no way that any sane person could believe Ricci, a known low-life and ex-con, to be "a trusted person in the neighborhood or in the community." That's pathetic.

I will not sit here and let you trash Salt Lake City by arguing that Ricci amounts to one of its trusted citizens. The only place where Ricci was ever trusted was apparently in prison, and that was probably a mistake.
23 posted on 07/30/2002 11:13:32 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
"grapsing at starws" should be "grasping at straws."

I swear, I don't know which is worse -- my typing or my eyes.
24 posted on 07/30/2002 11:18:21 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: brigette
Remember the day the chief of police stated that he believed they have already talked to the perp...Wasn't that the same day they talked with Ricci? Who else did they talk with that same day?
25 posted on 07/30/2002 11:19:32 AM PDT by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
Picture of Uncle Tom's $1.12M house for sale now posted here. I suspects he's getting ready to move to Winterton Farms.
26 posted on 07/30/2002 11:29:44 AM PDT by The people have spoken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bella
That's interesting. By "perp" did you understand him to mean the actual abductor?
27 posted on 07/30/2002 11:32:21 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
I realize that you have limited resources, BUT Ricci was trusted in the Smart home and one or more other homes in the neighborhood for several months UNTIL the theft of the Smart home. No one in the neighborhood had any idea about Ricci's criminal past and Ricci is known to be a smooth talker. Nice try, but you are going to have to do a lot better than that.
28 posted on 07/30/2002 11:55:58 AM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All
Did anyone here as the question: Who was it that recommended Ricci to Ed Smart ?

I was looking at transcripts, and ran across this one site, who had this posted. I find it interesting, and didn't think we asked this question of WHO recommended Ricci to Smart.

Wednesday, July 17, 2002

By Michael Y. Park

NEW YORK — Elizabeth Smart's father had no idea the man he hired as a contractor last year, Richard Albert Ricci, was a career criminal with a record that included burglary and attempted murder.

Ed Smart never would have hired Ricci had he known of the handyman's criminal past, the father of the missing 14-year-old girl has said.

But a quick glance at laws around the country show there are few guarantees that home contractors have a clean past, since most states that license them don’t require criminal background checks.

Had Utah run such a check on Ricci, they would have likely found a forest of red flags. Beginning with a burglary conviction in 1973, Ricci had been in and out of jail for 29 years, freed on parole most recently in 2000. Among his convictions: aggravated robbery, attempted homicide and a prison escape.

Ricci was charged last Thursday with one count of burglary and one count of theft for allegedly stealing $3,500 worth of items from the Smart home last June. He faces another count of theft for allegedly taking items from the home of a Smart neighbor, where he also worked as a handyman.

Utah requires anyone doing construction work in the state, including electricians and plumbers, to get a license from the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing. To qualify for a license, a contractor has to provide proof of insurance, register with the state tax commission and a bevy of state employment divisions, and provide a financial statement and three credit reports for each key employee.

The focus is on standards of professional experience, not on a contractor’s criminal history.

It’s much the same in Alabama, where any general contractor working on a residential project of $10,000 or more must be licensed. Though a potential licensee goes through the usual gamut of questions about his work history, and though the state takes a hard stance on scam artists trying to rip off unsuspecting homeowners, a criminal background check just doesn’t figure into the process.

"We ask them if they’ve been convicted of any crime associated with the construction business, and if we find out they’ve lied, we deny or revoke the license," said Chip Carden, executive director of the Alabama Home Licensure Board. "If they broke a law that doesn’t involve the construction business, there’s not a whole lot the board does about it."

Some states don’t even go that far. In Illinois, for example, most construction contractors, except for roofing workers, don’t need to be licensed at all. In New York, only asbestos-abatement contractors are licensed at the state level. All others are regulated locally.

Steve Schmidt, executive director of the National Association of State Contractor Licensing Agencies, in Scottsdale, Ariz., admitted it’s easy for an ex-con to slip through the cracks of states’ regulatory agencies.

"Many states are going to be asking, 'Are you convicted of a felony or have you have a license revoked in other states?'" he said. "Obviously, that's not a foolproof method."

Regulations aren't any tighter when it comes to nationwide organizations. Though some federal agencies require background checks for security reasons – the departments of Defense and State, for example – there are no across-the-board requirements for construction workers who are awarded federal contracts, according to Scott Brown, spokesman for Associated Builders and Contractors.

The Rosslyn, Va.-based trade organization represents over 23,000 construction and construction-related firms in the U.S.

The state of Nevada is the strictest of the states when it comes to checking out the criminal background of potential licensed contractors, Schmidt said.

Applicants in the Silver State have to go through a credit-history check and hand in four notarized references and Social Security verification. If there's anything fishy about any of those, the state does a criminal-background check that goes back 10 years in most cases, or even further if it seems something serious is afoot.

In some extreme cases, the state will even take fingerprints of the applicants. That has already uncovered two cases of false identity, said Nevada State Contractors Board spokeswoman Sonya Ruffin. About 10 percent of applicants go through a criminal-background check, she said.

But even Nevada's system has its limits, leaving final discretion up to homeowners, she said.

"Only the principals of the license are checked – it doesn't say anything about the people they hire," she said. "Be wary of the people your people are hiring. If it's not a person who's in a reputable company in the community, you take that risk."

After the Smart kidnapping, things might change.

Although criminal background checks in the contracting world are rare, drug testing is becoming more and more common, Brown said. The group encourages drug testing throughout the construction industry.

And Schmidt said that requiring criminal background checks will be an issue at a national contractors conference in Las Vegas in September.

Carden said giving licensing agencies the power to conduct criminal background checks could make the difference in Alabama.

"If we had the authority, yes, I think that would be great," he said. "It would help us better protect the public."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,57889,00.html

This is the site I found this on

29 posted on 07/30/2002 12:05:07 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
as=ask
30 posted on 07/30/2002 12:06:39 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
I swear, I don't know which is worse -- my typing or my eyes

LOL !! I J...even if your eyes were bad and your typing was in phonics..YOU make more sense and are such a joy to read, because you are civil, smart, polite, and present your thoughts in a very pleasant way.

You respond in a civil manner to people's opninions or questions, and you...Stand up for yourself to those who blatently critisize you for your thought.

My eyes read you..my brain desyphers what you say, and my mouth says, once again...

Thank you !

31 posted on 07/30/2002 12:16:28 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
That's interesting. By "perp" did you understand him to mean the actual abductor?

What I thought of, speaking for myself as to what Bella posted, was:

They talked to MANY people including family, neighbors, friends, and criminals. think

32 posted on 07/30/2002 12:22:27 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Jolly Green
I don't think of a handyman as being a trusted member of *this* community. Of course, I may be reading more into what was actually stated than was there.
34 posted on 07/30/2002 1:07:57 PM PDT by cookiedough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cookiedough
Also, Ricci was a hired worked, not a trusted *member* of the community or neighborhood. Again, I may be splitting hairs here -- I learned it from my kids. :-)
35 posted on 07/30/2002 1:11:35 PM PDT by cookiedough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cookiedough
worker, not worked -- I'm in the eyes/typing not so great club!
36 posted on 07/30/2002 1:12:39 PM PDT by cookiedough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cookiedough
trusted *member* of the community or neighborhood

I repeat it was "trusted PERSON in the community or neighborhood", not trusted member.

37 posted on 07/30/2002 1:16:56 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cookiedough
hahahahaha !! You can't be President..Iwo Jima is.
38 posted on 07/30/2002 1:18:01 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
I repeat it was "trusted PERSON in the community or neighborhood", not trusted member.

PERSON...ok...if the PERSON is trusted in a neighborhood OR community...wouldn't that make them a member of either?

You would have tobe PRESENT in either for a period of time to be RECOGNISED as such,....wouldn't you ? LOL

39 posted on 07/30/2002 1:26:12 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
Thank you for the compliment.

By engaging in this juvenile discussion of "person" vs. "member" (boy, there is a dirty joke in there somewhere), you have admitted that you really can't contravert any of my basic assumptions and conclusions. In other words, you have

PRAISED ME WITH FAINT DAMNS.
40 posted on 07/30/2002 1:54:16 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson