To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, to put it on a warrant, they need to have specific reasons, not general.
To: UCANSEE2
I'm sure that aside from whatever clues they received from the DW interview, when a kidnapping of a little girl happens,they have a pre-made list of items to look for... Otherwise, they'd be winging it every time.
To: UCANSEE2
25 THE COURT: I think everyone knows what the
26 burden of proof is in a preliminary hearing, and it appears
27 to this court and to me that the crimes alleged in the
28 complaint have been committed. There's no question about
Page 751
1 that.
2 I have reasonable cause to believe that
3 Mr. Westerfield is guilty of them. He will be held to
4 answer.
To: UCANSEE2
Who's the client? The people.
What's their position? The people believe that Danielle was removed (kidnapped) from her home without the knowledge of her parents by said defendant, David alan wasterfield. Sometime during the kidnapping, DW killed Danielle. The motivation can be shown by his collection of rape videos of which the jury should remember seeing during the opening statement. The people believes that the murder occurred sometime between feb 1st thru feb 4th..as evidenced by her mummified skin..as testified about to you, the jurors by our expert mummyologist. The mummyologist explained to you that the skin of such a young child can indeed mummify within 24 hrs after time of death... yada yada yada..
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson