[Freedom2specul8]

That's the atty's PURPOSE. Display the facts or evidence to the jury and then tie it all together in the end. Just what do you think the purpose of the "closing" statement is?

[UCANSEE2]

Kim, my response was in response to the idea that the PROS in the Skakel case pulled some kind of rabbit out of his hat, and that DUSEK will do the same here.

(1) Cases not at all the same.

(2) the Prosec in the Skakel case did no such thing. It was discussed and debunked already once. Did you miss that discussion.

Sure The prosec is supposed to summary the case. Just because he does a summary doesn't mean HE WINS AUTOMATICALLY. He has to have a case first. Don't think he does. We will see what the Jury thinks as what I think doesn't mean a hill of beans to anyone but me.