However in this case common wisdom about what Dusek said is in error.
Mainly because Dusek couldn't back up his opening statement with evidence. Everyone assumed he was trying to prove DW kidnapped Danielle from her bedroom, took her in the SUV to the MH, and describe what he did with her while she was in captivity, then how and where he killed her, and how / where he dumped the body.
He proved none of this, so we all must have understood his opening statements.