Posted on 07/28/2002 8:56:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA
By Alex Roth
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
July 28, 2002
Expect to hear more evidence about insects as the David Westerfield trial enters what could be the final week of testimony before jury deliberations.
On Tuesday, prosecutors are scheduled to call Dr. M. Lee Goff of the University of Hawaii as their final rebuttal witness in a trial that has lasted 23 court days. Goff is a forensic entomologist and the author of "A Fly for the Prosecution: How Insect Evidence Helps Solve Crimes."
Whether Goff will be the final insect expert in the case jurors have already heard from three witnesses with expert opinions about the behavior of insects on human remains is unclear. Westerfield's lawyers have said they will take at least a day to present evidence to rebut the prosecution's rebuttal.
The trial will not be in session tomorrow because the lawyers and judge are scheduled to hash out the legal instructions that will be read to the jury after the close of testimony. The instructions guide jurors on the law to be applied in the case.
Given the time estimates of the lawyers, it seems likely that closing statements won't come until Thursday, or the following Monday at the earliest. So far there haven't been any Friday sessions in which the jury was present to hear testimony. The judge said the jury will deliberate Mondays through Fridays.
As the case winds down, the battle of the insect experts has emerged as perhaps the final arena in the murder trial. Westerfield's lawyers say the insects found on 7-year-old Danielle van Dam's body prove that it couldn't have been dumped until after Westerfield was under 24-hour police surveillance.
Danielle was reported missing from her home Feb. 2, and her body was found by volunteer searchers Feb. 27 in a remote area off Dehesa Road near the Singing Hills Golf Course in El Cajon.
The defense called two entomologists who testified about blowflies on the girl's body. Westerfield's lawyers say the experts' testimony proves that the remains couldn't have been dumped until mid-February. Westerfield was under constant police surveillance beginning Feb. 5.
The prosecution countered with a forensic anthropologist who said the body's extreme mummification might help explain why blowflies weren't able to access the remains immediately.
Westerfield, a self-employed design engineer who lived two doors from the van Dams in Sabre Springs, is accused of kidnapping and killing Danielle. He is also accused of possession of child pornography, which the prosecution claims shows that he had a sexual interest in girls.
Prosecutors said the pornography some of it depicting violent sexual attacks against young girls was found on Westerfield's computers and on computer disks stored on his office bookshelf.
In a trial of numerous shifts in momentum, legal experts say prosecutors scored a significant blow last week by calling Westerfield's son as a witness. Neal Westerfield, now 19, testified that the computer child pornography in the house was his father's, not his.
Earlier in the trial, the defense presented a computer expert who testified that Neal Westerfield might have been the person who downloaded some of the pornography.
"This is a young man who clearly cares about his dad and has a good relationship with him, so he has no reason to say anything bad," said Peter Liss, a Vista criminal defense lawyer. "He was just truthful."
In this respect, the defense's strategy of trying to blame the son for the child pornography in the house appears to have backfired. Criminal defense lawyer Robert Grimes said the jury is likely to view Neal Westerfield as "basically a nice young college kid" who testified honestly.
Westerfield's lawyers chose not to cross-examine his son. They will indicate this week whether they will call any witnesses to try to refute his testimony.
Becoming a standard reply, for many of us.
Thanks I didn't know that. Where is that point made ?
One of the defense witnesses, Glennie something, testified that he was wearing all black, including black boots and the jacket.
Also wearing a baseball cap, which Keith Sherman said is Westerfield's custom.
Interestingly, Susan L. (the ex) said he didn't own a pair of black boots, and there don't seem to be any in his house (but, then, consider he was barefoot on drycleaning trip #1).
So, your premise is that every abductor leaves evidence behind when the enter a home and take a child. Interesting.
It still is not highly unlikely that Danielle wandered in and explored his Motor Home, she was a child, and kids do that. Bored ones who don't wander far from home especially...that's how her hair and blood got in there. We agree to disagree on this.
Night all. It was a civilized and interesting read tonight.
sw
Q AS A RESULT OF THE VARIOUS EXAMINATIONS THAT YOU CONDUCTED, BOTH VISUALLY AND BY THE INFRARED METHOD, DID YOU NOTE ANY SIMILARITIES OR CONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THOSE FORTY-SIX FIBERS AND THE BLUE FIBERS TAKEN FROM ITEM 92, THE SHEET COVERING DANIELLE VAN DAM'S BODY?
A YES, I DID. IN ALL THE WAYS THAT I MEASURED AND COMPARED THE FIBERS, THE FIBERS FROM THE MOTOR HOME WERE THE SAME AS THE FIBERS ON THE SHEET
Come on folks. The blue fibers in various spots of the RV matched the blue fibers on her ?
Same blue fibers in his laundry that he was busy doing when police first went in his house.
Visit: 1 ---cookies sold to him a year ago
Visit: 2 ---cookie delivery..a year ago
Visit: 3 ---dads
Visit: 4 ---selling cookies
Visit: 5 ---dads
(EXCERPTS OUT OF ORDER)
http://members.cox.net/jeneal/PrelimTranscripts/PVW314.txt
SNIP
14 Q CAN YOU ESTIMATE FOR US HOW MANY PERSONAL
15 CONTACTS YOU'VE HAD WITH MR. WESTERFIELD, BY THAT
16 I'M EXCLUDING THE HI-AND-BYE DRIVING DOWN THE STREET
17 TYPE THINGS, WHERE YOU HAD A CHANCE TO EITHER TALK
18 WITH HIM OR BE WITH HIM IN A LOCATION?
19 A APPROXIMATELY FOUR. WAIT A MINUTE. LET ME
20 WAIT. I SHOULD SAY FIVE TO SIX.
21 Q CAN YOU REMEMBER THE FIRST CONTACT THAT
22 YOU'VE HAD WITH HIM, OTHER THAN THE HI-AND-BYE?
23 A I THINK IT WAS SELLING GIRL SCOUT COOKIES
24 THE YEAR BEFORE.
25 Q THE YEAR BEFORE DANIELLE'S DISAPPEARANCE?
26 A YES
19 Q AND A YEAR AGO WHEN THE COOKIES WERE SOLD
20 OR AT LEAST GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE SOLD AT
21 MR. WESTERFIELD'S HOUSE, DO YOU REMEMBER ANYTHING AT
22 ALL ABOUT THAT CONTACT?
23 A I REMEMBER THAT HE INVITED US IN.
24 Q A YEAR AGO?
25 A A YEAR AGO.
26 Q DID YOU GO IN?
27 A WE STAYED IN THE LIVING ROOM, AND HE FILLED
28 OUT THE ORDER FORM.
SNIP
23 Q WHAT'S THE NEXT CONTACT WITH 24 MR. WESTERFIELD THAT STANDS OUT IN YOUR MIND? 25 A WHEN I WENT TO DAD'S, THE FRIDAY BEFORE THE 26 -- THE 1ST.
snip
5 MR. WESTERFIELD WAS WHEN? 6 A WHEN DANIELLE AND I SOLD GIRL SCOUT 7 COOKIES. 8 Q THAT WOULD BE THE SECOND GIRL SCOUT TRIP? 9 A YES. 19 A HE INVITED US IN. 20 Q DID YOU GO IN? 21 A WE WENT IN. I ASKED HIM IF I COULD SEE THE 22 KITCHEN. 23 Q THE KITCHEN FOR WHAT REASON? 24 A TO SEE THE REMODEL.
SNIP
22 A I BELIEVE WE WALKED OUT FRONT. HE STARTED 23 TALKING ABOUT A PLACE CALLED INCAHOOTS AND HE WANTED 24 ME TO GO THERE, I THINK WEDNESDAY NIGHT WAS SOME 25 KIND OF SPECIAL NIGHT. THAT'S WHY I'M THINKING I 26 SOLD COOKIES ON TUESDAY. HE SAID, "DON'T FORGET TO 27 WEAR YOUR BOOTS TO INCAHOOTS."
SNIP
21 Q WHEN WAS THE NEXT TIME THAT YOU SAW HIM? 22 A AT DAD'S CAFE ON FRIDAY EVENING. NIGHT. 23 Q THAT WOULD BE FEBRUARY 1ST? 24 A YES
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.