Posted on 07/26/2002 11:29:06 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
Smeagol rules!
Oh, what Providence. These pieces of luggage where enough to distract the Orcs from looking further for the Ringbearer. They do suffer from their captivity, but provide the necessary diversion, and as a reward become well aquainted with the Ents. Now that's a nice reward.
HotD, I think your comment about their unflappableness was very apt. The one characteristic of all the Hobbits that I noticed was that they just did what was necessary- an unflambouyant sense of duty. They were never flashy, nor exceptional in any visible way, they just kept doing what was required. A trait not often the subject of great poetry or legends--but very admirable and appreciated by close friends.
Oh, what Providence. These pieces of luggage where enough to distract the Orcs from looking further for the Ringbearer. They do suffer from their captivity, but provide the necessary diversion, and as a reward become well aquainted with the Ents. Now that's a nice reward.
HotD, I think your comment about their unflappableness was very apt. The one characteristic of all the Hobbits that I noticed was that they just did what was necessary- an unflambouyant sense of duty. They were never flashy, nor exceptional in any visible way, they just kept doing what was required. A trait not often the subject of great poetry or legends--but very admirable and appreciated by close friends and family.
Tuor's View of Orces Eventses:
Warning: Occasional Minor Spoilers Within
We already know that Saruman was aware that the Ring was being sent south. He didn't send out all those Creban for nothing, and once the Fellowship failed to come through the Gap, he must've figured out where they were going, just not exactly when.
Sauron also knew they were moving the Ring south. The Nazgul on the River that Legolas shot down was not there by accident. Like Saruman, he knew that Ring was going by the River, but not exactly where, and he didn't yet have enough forces in the area to completely block all travel...not yet.
So, both Saruman and Sauron sent out what expeditionary forces they could. Sauron undoubtably coordinated things with Saruman through the Palantir, and their forces met up at the location it was felt the Ring would most likely reach, based on previous sightings of the Fellowship and the power of the Eye.
Saruman thought he would be pulling a fast one by concealing to Sauron that *he* wanted the Ring, and instructed his forces that if they found the Hobbits, they should be brought alive to Isengard, and *not* taken to Mordor, as Sauron undoubtably ordered.
It is hard to say whether or not Sauron knew that Saruman was going to double-cross him. He must've at least suspected something like that would happen, since Saruman -- unlike the good guys -- was motivated by the same things Sauron was, and therefore well within Sauron's reckoning.
So, to finish, both forces were sent to get the Hobbits (and therefore the Ring) and were ostensibly supposed to take the Ring to Mordor, only Saruman underhandedly gave his own troops different orders and sent a force large enough to see that they ended up being followed. That is what occurred (more than once) at this point of the story, with the results we shall soon see.
Tuor
Just curious, how did his baring a scar encourage you?
As to who as in charge of the Moria orcs: Sauron is nominally in charge of *all* Orcs. The Uruk-hai ended up being called traitors by other Orcs because they obeyed Saruman before Sauron.
Tuor
I'm sure Saruman did know that the ring was headed south (expecting it to be on it's way to Minas Tirith) but we don't really know that he sent the Crebain. The book says the Crebain came from the south and both Saruman and Sauron are south. I know it's a nitpicky thing and it's just as likely to be his doing as Sauron's.
Sauron undoubtably coordinated things with Saruman through the Palantir
This is what I really have my doubts about. Why should Sauron trust Saruman with any part of this job when he didn't really have to? I don't think Sauron would tell Saruman anything about the Ring if he could help it and coordinating a mission like this would be too risky. I'm just thinking that such trust would be unlikely on Sauron's part.
This reminds me of a passage from the previous chapter that I had underlined and should have mentioned earlier.
Eomer speaking to Aragorn after asking for privacy from the rest of the Mark--"All that you say is strange, Aragorn,' he said. "Yet you speak the truth, that is plain: the Men of the Mark do not lie, and therefore they are not easily deceived. As long as I am quoting old material- there was another passage from "The Riders of Rohan" that made a deep impression on me.
Again, Eomer to Aragon, "How shall a man judge what to do in such times?"
Aragorn replies; "Good and ill have not changed since yesteryear, nor are they one thing among Elves and Dwares and another amoung Men. It is a man's part to discern them, as much in the Golden Wood as in his own house."
Sorry, I should have been more agile, and mentioned this in the previous chapter.
The converse of the first quote is pure scripture - - "....men will go about deceiving and being deceived."
In LOTR, only rarely does the term "goblin" appear, and generally they are called "Orcs". I wonder if, after more thought, he simply liked the more foreign, less supernatural, name "Orc" better?
In The Letters of JRR Tolkien (#144) he writes:
Orcs (the word is as far as I am concerned actually derived from Old English orc 'demon', but only because of its phonetic suitablility) are nowhere clearly stated to be of any particular origin. But since they are servants of the Dark Power, and later of Sauron, neither of whom could, or would, produce living things, they must be 'corruptions'. They are not based on direct experience of mine; but owe, I suppose, a good deal to the goblin tradition (goblin is used as a translation in The Hobbit, where orc occurs once, I think) especially as it appears in George MacDonald, except for the soft feet which I never believed in. The name has the form orch (pl. yrch) in Sindarin and uruk in the Black Speech.
True... but I had always figured the Crebain were part of Radagast still helping Saruman, not knowing of his treachery. Or would Radagast have been aware of Saruman's treachery by this point in the story?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.