[rwfromkansas]

There was a story on 48 Hours last week that showed the expedition one man went to searching for the "monster." In any case, he came up dry except for finding a carcass of something that looked like it on the bottom of the loch (this was all found with the news crew watching). However, when he went back to find it again, he didn't.

Anyway, he showed a photo from several years ago (he has an underwater camera in the Loch) where for one frame, something that looked like Nessie appeared and then disappeared. Is he a fraud? Nobody has claimed he is.

[balrog666]

There was a story on 48 Hours last week that showed the expedition one man went to searching for the "monster." In any case, he came up dry except for finding a carcass of something that looked like it on the bottom of the loch (this was all found with the news crew watching). However, when he went back to find it again, he didn't.

Um, you mean ... "he came up dry except for reporting finding a carcass". Which no one else saw? And am I to take it that he dove alone to the 200m+ depths of Loch Ness?? Oh, and where was his camera on this trip to the bottom?

Anyway, he showed a photo from several years ago (he has an underwater camera in the Loch) where for one frame, something that looked like Nessie appeared and then disappeared. Is he a fraud? Nobody has claimed he is.

You lost me. What exactly is he claiming that we can call him fraudulent about?