Before I prove you to be a complete, total, utterly ignorant fool, why don't you retract some of what you said?
The reasons I have for not retracting "anything" I wrote are as follows:
1) you have not provided a scintilla of evidence to refute anything I wrote.
2) you have provided NO evidence that the Math Depts. of the top 50 Universities teach technical courses in "Sacred Geometry," which should be trivially easy to do, if it is as Mathematically important as you keep making it out to be.
3) your bloviating threats to "prove you to be a complete, total, utterly ignorant fool" don't impress me in the least.
4) and last, but not least, I decline your "invitation" to retract my statements because, how shall I put this...........
I already have a degree in Mathematics from a top-25 University.
To recapitulate my point, "Sacred Geometry" isn't part of the curricula of serious Mathematics Departments, and serious Mathematicians, like Peano, Cantor, Hilbert, Gödel, Whitehead, and Russell, didn't, and don't, spend their time working on it or worrying about what the value of "phi" is to a bazzillionth decimal place.
Hence, the idea that Space Aliens would travel the Galaxy to stomp "messages" about "Sacred Geometry" in farmer's fields makes no sense at all, at least to someone formally trained in Mathematics.
So spare me your assinine threats to "prove me a fool" and so forth, and spare me your private FReepmail telling me your opinion of my intellect and how closed-minded you think I am. But you are entitled to your opinion.....