I'm sorry. A Freeper by the name of Strela has expressed some not unfounded (imo) critcism of the Westerfield threads. Name calling would be an example. I thought you could have expressed your opinion to redlipstick without the last few words that I highlighted.
Well, I'm sorry too. If someone can't see how the Avila case cuts two ways -- i.e., he might be the van Dam perp or the jury will get overreact because of his previous acquittal and subsequent arrest for the Runnion atrocity -- then they are thick as a brick. I simply called it as I saw it: One poster noted the adverse effect that two recent, high-profile murders would have on the case, and "redlipstick" had the gall to suggest his post was "unbelievable."
To cut to the chase, I was compelled to respond as I did. Wait...can I sue someone for coaxing me into a belligerent response? ;-)