Replies

No one seems to be able to come up with any idea how DW was supposed to have entered the house and taken Danielle without any noise or fingerprints. But how can a Drunk person be so "smooth"?

So we have those who say "she was asleep", those who say "he killed her first" and those who say "we don't know", but he did. But from almost day one, the Van Dams covered how Danielle might not have woken up when she was carried out of the house saying "she may have thought it was her father carrying her"..

I say, if he didn't do it, then we have to consider all the other possible suspects, and they all originate from inside that home..unless she walked out, which Damon and Brenda covered from day one, saying "she sleep-walked". The Van Dams seemed to be one step ahead of things.

But in Duseks opening statement to the Jury, he promised that he would show how Westerfield took this child and how he murdered her. We wait.

No one seems to be able to come up with any idea how DW was supposed to have entered the house and taken Danielle without any noise or fingerprints. But how can a Drunk person be so "smooth"?

And it's been established that he is not a "smooth" drunk...as per his DWI because of weaving.

"You're feeling sleepy, very sleepy... I'm going to give you a suggestion now...when I say the keyword you will know in your mind that the defendant is guilty and facts are irrelevant....the keyword is blowflies. I will snap my fingers and you will awake feeling refreshed and not remember being hypnotized (read bored to sleep)"

Court: Mr. Dusek, next witness.

Dusek: The state calls Lee Goff. Mr. Goff could you tell the court what your specialty is?

Goff: I am an eggspurt in the area of forensic entomology.

Dusek: What specifically is that they study of?

Goff: That is the study of blowflies.

The rest as they say is history as the mad rush begins