[spectre]

Yes, that would be only common sense. Can you just imagine having actual scratches and/or teeth marks and NOT using it as evidence? I can't. The case would have been a slam-dunk.

sw

[Lanza]

The case would have been a slam-dunk. Hey, here's a slam dunk for ya. How about the prosecution show the jury some evidence like um... fingerprints in the VD house on the door no one locked, Danielle's room, maybe a neighbor who saw DW carrying a screaming child away from the VD's house, and how about some dna from DW under Danielle's nails (you know those scratches even judge mudd considers not evidence). Oh, I forgot, they don't have any of that.