I am curious as to why DW appears creepy to you. Is it colored by what you believe about him to be true? Or just generally the way he looks to you.
Hi bluebird..I don't think I've used that term before..but I will say that what 'creeps me out' are the
child porn rape scene videos,
the child porn in general,
The scratches on his arms and legs that FOR SOME reason judge mudd did not allow or the prosecution chose to not bring up during the trial
the strange behaviour at the dry cleaners,
the evidence in the MH...,
his mom's description of him,
his girlfriends comments about his drinking problem and why she left him,
his girlfriends comments about why the curtains were normally drawn in MH while camping..(cold weather)..the other campers said it wasn't cold..
the testimony about time of death/mummylologist and the bugologists....
There are a combinations of other things. For example, if would be easier to believe the theory that danielle played in the mh if there were other kids that did it too and confessed to it....
The defense has not denied the evidence... they are trying to throw doubt wrt:the time of death. What keeps me from saying he's guilty.. Feldman's comments
http://www.uniontrib.com/news/metro/danielle/20020506-9999_1m6westerfieldpapers.html
The sealed motions discuss other potential evidence in the case, including evidence that Westerfield's lawyers label in court documents as "nearly as explosive as a confession." The lawyers didn't specify the nature of this evidence. Westerfield's lawyers want to keep these sealed motions secret from the public through Westerfield's trial and until all his post-trial appeals are exhausted if he's convicted, according to documents made public today
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/644958/posts
pics of scratches
Remember the sheriff involved in the samantha case said the suspect may have scratches and/or bruises on his arms?
Well, would the sheriff have said the same thing about danielle's captor if he had been in charge of the vd case? me thinks so.