To: Jaded
Exactly. So for the prosecution to say that DW DEFINATELY killed Danielle, based on a few fibers with no source, and DNA spots that can't be "time-tested"...is premature and irresponsible.
We know the odds of Danielle being in the MH are better than average, BUT, since the prosecution can't determine WHEN she was in the MH, their case is resting purely on circumstance.
To: ItsOurTimeNow
We know the odds of Danielle being in the MH are better than average,What is the source for this?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson