Replies

You have zero clue as to what presumption of innocence means, and you constantly build your arguements off of a presumption of guilt. Because of that constancy, what amounts to incessant malice-founded hectoring, your contribution to these threads borders on evil.

You have been a unwavering teacher of malice, of how to hold any little bit of twisted evidence, testimony, or prosecutorial misconduct against the defendant, you have trained those who might have taken your arguments to heart in any sense, how to do great evil in a trial, should they sit n a jury.

BVW, Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses and you know that. What is happening is that a few people, not many, on BOTH sides of the fence have selectively chosen which testimony they like and don't like. I emphasize FEW because clearly the majority of folks following this case are *still* on the fence..and they are open to seeing the valid points both prosecution and defense has made.

That was CLEARLY shown when those who didn't like the prosecution's case, got so trivial that they even made snide comments about the "looks" of the witnesses. If you don't remember that, please go back and look at 2 or 3 days worth of threads that followed the testimony. The "DW has been railroaded theory" was started back in february... Arguments and testimony that supports that theory has been praised..but arguments that might discredit that theory has been trashed. Check the thread that followed the testimony of those witnesses who hung out in the same bar but were talked about much differently if the defense called them to the stand. It was even pointed out a couple of times.