You seem to be saying that Democrat party operatives, over several elections, consistently pre-planned some amount of voter fraud. And to obscure this voter fraud (at least obscure it statistically), they would feed the anticipated fraudulent vote count to Zogby, who would factor it into his polls towards election day, thereby making his polls more accurately reflect the outcome (so Zogby benefits), and because at least one pollster (zogby) has an accurate forecast of the 'vote', there is less appearance of vote fraud (so the operatives benefit).
i.e. instead of people wondering, 'how is it all the pollsters always get the Democrat turnout wrong - where does the extra democrat vote come from?' people just assume Zogby is a much better pollster and there is nothing to question in the Democrat turnout.
Did I paraphrase that correctly? Might you have any other sources for this theory? If true, it would implicate Zogby in voter fraud, I think.
Yes that's my theory.
Did I paraphrase that correctly? Might you have any other sources for this theory? If true, it would implicate Zogby in voter fraud, I think.
You have to have public support to go after this. The Democrats protect themselves by having the media convince the public that Republicans "turn people from the voting stations" when Republicans try to install accountability. Well yes people would be turned from the voting stations because the same people are voting at multiple stations. That's how Philly had more than 100% turnout. As far as Zogby being implicated, look at everything that Clinton and his fellow Dems got away with. That many associates don't just die of unnatural causes during a person's lifetime at opportune moments, and he had to have help. When you're a part of organized crime, you can get away with a lot. Inside information on vote fraud is small compared to the treason and murder of the Clinton gang, not to mention his individual crimes like rape.
Chicago ran 100% for Gore for a time last election, Philly had more than 100% turnout, and in the last few election cycles, Zogby makes his "election day adjustments", after running with every other poll all campaign long, making him "right" on election day and everyone else "wrong". Add to that that the three main states that Gore needed to win, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, were the most "off" with most pollsters. Add to that that Dems are against better voter ID systems and the theory makes a lot of sense. And don't forget the things they did out in the open, such as throw away military ballots and demand multiple recounts in only counties that would help them and attempted blocks in counties that may hurt them and it's easy to see that there is nothing that is beneath their ethics or morality. Vote fraud is nothing to them.