Replies

No! No such thing. I think you need to reread the original post. This clown is saying he is all for free speech, but telling Jim that he should remove anyone who bashes Bush. I happen to like W. but don't think this guy should tell Jim to censor people when he professes to be all for free speech.

You missed the point entirely. Those whose obvious purpose is to bash conservative politicians are being shown the door already, in spite of whether Big Guy and Rusty 99 advocates it or not. And guess what? Being shown the door is perfectly Constitutional.

The New York Times supports the 1st Amendment, but that Amendment does not give anyone the right to be read on the pages of the New York Times. The local radio station supports the 1st Amendment, but that doesn't entitle you or anyone else to a free hour of air time. Anyone is free to start their own rag or radio station or web server.

You claim that Big Guy and Rusty 99 should not be telling Jim to censor people, as if Big Guy and Rusty 99 has no 1st Amendment right to advocate what he believes either. How convoluted and cloudy can the ideologue's thinking get? Sheesh.

"You claim that Big Guy and Rusty 99 should not be telling Jim to censor people, as if Big Guy and Rusty 99 has no 1st Amendment right to advocate what he believes either."

...and you're telling me I have no right to my opinion. Should we all just walk in lock-step like liberals?