Tell me whom YOU favor / agree with and I'll find a name to call you , to vent MY ire. Fair is fair, after all. NO ?
I agree with that summation when you can conclude that the driving motive of the attacker amounts to 'destroy Bush' -- but in this case the 'customer dissatisfaction' is IN HOUSE. In short, as long as a person [A] voted for Bush, and [B] is expressing sincere dissatisfaction, it is encumbant on Bush and the Republican Party to address the situation once it gets to the degree that it has apparently achieved.
The 'Well, other than that he's a good President' is a Clintonian deflection. Those who support Bush have every right and responsibility to keep an accurate tab on performance and to vocalize thier dissapproval in accordance to its intensity.
Feedback.
Tell me whom YOU favor / agree with and I'll find a name to call you , to vent MY ire. Fair is fair, after all. NO ?
Im not an elected official, hence my concern over your opinion or degree of irritation is non-existant. On the other hand, if you can present good arguments against a stance I hold, I welcome the opportunity to review and test the integrity of what I've come to believe.
If your giving away cake, feces is not a good topping, BUT if the cake you PURCHASED has ingredients that leave a bad taste in your mouth -- it is in the bakers interest to know exactly how you feel.