Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ValerieUSA
Here's Ann Coulter's take on the recent decision by the Supremes

One thing I can say about Anne .. she doesn't beat around the bush .. she just says it like it is .. lol

Indeed, Depends undergarments would be a necessity on the high court, as justices struggled with whether that feeling in their bellies meant they had to go to the bathroom or needed to burp

231 posted on 04/24/2002 7:38:22 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1
We'll have to be careful what we cut an paste of Coulter's or Prentice will be locked out of this thread, too. *LOL* His net nanny keeps a tight leash on him. This ought to pass the censor:

In response to this law, Justice Kennedy expounded on William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" – "the most famous pair of teen-age lovers." He continued: "The right to think is the beginning of freedom, and ... speech is the beginning of thought."

Oh, cut it out.

... In addition to Shakespeare, Kennedy claims that if Congress were permitted to outlaw virtual images of children in explicit sex scenes, movies like "Traffic" and "American Beauty" might be made differently. "Legitimate movie producers," Kennedy anxiously warns, might not "risk distributing images in or near the uncertain reach of this law."

Justice William Rehnquist points out in his dissent that both "American Beauty" and "Traffic" were made (and given awards) while this precise child porno law was on the books. Not only that, but during that time, four of five federal appeals courts were upholding the law. As Rehnquist says: "The chill felt by the court ... has apparently never been felt by those who actually make movies."

Moreover, the actress who played a teen-age girl in the crucially important simulated sex scene in "Traffic" was not, in fact, a minor. (Why does no one ever say, "'Casablanca' was a good movie – but what it really needed was simulated sex scenes with kids"?)

235 posted on 04/24/2002 7:43:12 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson