So quimby, you're referring to the quote posted at #492?
I thank Senator Byrd--on this issue. GWB Team is wrong on this one.
This is the quote that led you to post the following...?
To: Sabertooth
Find even one complimentary thing I've said about Robert Byrd, in any context, for any reason, ever.
Here's your quote:
I thank Senator Byrd
Now comes the time when you start asking for more. Ask all you want, phoney.
373 posted on 3/31/02 10:15 PM Pacific by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
To: Sabertooth
Post the link and the context, please.
What do you think this is, Byrd brain, 20 questions ?
You asked for it, you got it. You denied it, you lied. What else are you lying about ?
Its in my archives, Bryd brain. Just like your pompass assertions about Dick Army and Ron Paul.
389 posted on 3/31/02 10:34 PM Pacific by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
To: Sabertooth
You claim to have all of this evidence, and I'm still waiting. So post it already.
So, let me get this strait. You post this :
Find even one complimentary thing I've said about Robert Byrd, in any context, for any reason, ever.
And I give you the answer. Are you denying the statement ?
394 posted on 3/31/02 10:46 PM Pacific by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
To: Sabertooth
This should be easy... post the quote of me saying something complimentary about Robert Byrd, with the link, please.
No, you asked this question:
Find even one complimentary thing I've said about Robert Byrd, in any context, for any reason, ever.
I responded, "I thank Senator Byrd" Now I ask you, Did you make that statement ? Its really quite easy, mr clintoon. You are the one who is making the denial about "one complimentary thing."
Its really quite simple without further debate. Did you lie in the above statement or was it a bluff, mr Byrd brain ?
404 posted on 3/31/02 11:00 PM Pacific by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
To: Sabertooth
The truth must really trouble you after you posted this drivel:
Find even one complimentary thing I've said about Robert Byrd, in any context, for any reason, ever.
Sure, clintoon would change the subject, too, phoney. Deny, delay, distract. Right out of the demoncraps playbook.
This is what you posted one another thread:
I thank Senator Byrd
Its in your court, deny or affirm your statement (or continue to distract the arguement). BTW, I noticed you denied the statement on the same thread you posted the statement, so, one must doubt your ability to remember from one response to the next.
441 posted on 3/31/02 11:55 PM Pacific by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Time and again, quimby, you called me a liar, accused me of being some sort of fan of Robert Byrd, and claimed I said : "I thank Senator Byrd."
A number of times, I asked you to post the link and the context, but you refused. Now, Victoria Delsoul has found the sentence from which you took that fragment.
Would you like to see the LINK?
BTW, for simplicity, I've provided that entire post here...
To: Sabertooth
Section 245 of the Act allows an alien to apply for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident (LPR) while in the United States if certain conditions are met. The alien must have been inspected and admitted or paroled, be eligible for an immigrant visa and admissible for permanent residence, and, with some exceptions, have maintained lawful nonimmigrant status. The alien must also not have engaged in unauthorized employment. Section 245(i) of the Act allows an alien to apply to adjust status under section 245 notwithstanding the fact that he or she entered without inspection, overstayed, or worked without authorization.
So, if they are "eligible" for legal admission, let them apply by legal means. That whole "description" of the law is legaleze gibberish which opens up dozens of contradictory loopholes.
The GWB Team made a mistake supporting/pushing this provision of the bill. Amnesty was a "sore" topic when it was first passed in the mid 1990's. After 9-11, after the INS fiasco with the Atta entry approval, the GWB Team should have looked at the polls reflecting the mood of the Nation on this issue. Most polls were 80%+ opposed to amnesty--due in part to the recent attacks on America.
GWB Team may have been playing political "strategery" with this--but many of the people opposing amnesty will see it as a sell out. GWB Team has given the Dems a hot button issue. Bad "strategery" for GWB.
I thank Senator Byrd--on this issue. GWB Team is wrong on this one.
(emphasis added)
8 posted on 3/19/02 3:18 AM Pacific by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Ah, quimby, do you see the problem with this quote here?I didn't write "I thank Senator Byrd," it was written to me by TomGuy.
Do you not understand what a "quote" is?
You called me a liar repeatedly based on a quote you wouldn't source or place in context, despite my several requests that you do so... and it turns out that the quote wasn't even mine.
So, quimby, it turns out your accusations against me weren't just false, but also laughably, relentlessly stupid.
Was there anything else?
