Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JenB
And maybe since Hobbits (even Smeagol) aren't politically ambitious, they weren't corrupted by it or the corruption took longer.

Now, I don't know what would have happened if you gave the ring to Paladin, Thain of the Shire. A Took as a dark lord? Hmmmm....

705 posted on 03/21/2002 8:01:27 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies ]


To: carton253
And maybe since Hobbits (even Smeagol) aren't politically ambitious, they weren't corrupted by it or the corruption took longer.

Didn't Gandalf eventually decide that it was a higher power, and not just his liking for them, that brought him to associate with the Hobbits, because their simplicity and lack of ambition made them the only possibility on Middle Earth to dispose of the Ring. We know what would have happened if a man, elf, or Wizard had gotten their hands on it, and the dwarves would have used it to get all of the precious metals and jewels on earth into their possession.

708 posted on 03/21/2002 8:08:14 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies ]

To: carton253
A Took as a dark lord?

The world would never know! :D

711 posted on 03/21/2002 8:27:13 AM PST by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson