To: Sam Cree
Hi, Sam, welcome back from your trip!
I'm with you, I'm not sure I buy all of the numeric relationships that the Pyramids are supposed to have either... I agree with you, if you fudge measurements and keep dividing/combining you can get pretty much any numerical relationship you want to get.
However, I do agree with one of the themes of the book, which is that the Great Pyramids and the Sphinx are actually a lot older than current archaelogy gives them credit for. The theory of dating the Sphinx to the last zodiacal age of Leo makes a lot of sense to me, for instance.
I didn't know that about sunflowers, but I once read a book about Chaos Theory. I wasn't able to follow a lot of the math, but I did learn from it that a lot of natural processes follow "chaotic" patterns. That is, a lot of what seems chaotic in nature actually follows a complex number sequence or formula, such as the Fibbonacci sequence. Very interesting stuff!
To: Bear_in_RoseBear
Thank you
the Great Pyramids and the Sphinx are actually a lot older than current archaelogy gives them credit for
Yes, I agree that he's convincing on that. Just the radically different building styles would make you think so, not to mention the traditional and documentary evidence. I wonder what Blam's opinion is.
I hadn't known that Charleston is such a beautiful and historical city. I have a new respect for South Carolina. I might actually take my wife there for a weekend, I'm pretty sure she'll want to go on the ghosts of Charleston tour.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson