Posted on 03/14/2002 5:07:26 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
This is a continuation of the infamous thread New Zealander Builds Hobbit Hole originally posted on January 26, 2001 by John Farson, who at the time undoubtedly thought he had found a rather obscure article that would elicit a few replies and die out. Without knowing it, he became the founder of the Hobbit Hole. For reasons incomprehensible to some, the thread grew to over 4100 replies. It became the place for hobbits and friends of hobbits to chit chat and share LoTR news and views, hang out, and talk amongst ourselves in the comfort of familiar surroundings.
In keeping with the new posting guidelines, the thread idea is continuing here, as will the Green Dragon Inn, our more structured spin-off thread, as soon as we figure out how to move all the good discussion that has been had there. As for the Hobbit Hole, we will just start fresh, bringing only a few mathoms such as the picture above with us to make it feel like home, and perhaps a walk down memory lane:
Our discussion has been light:
It very well may be that a thread named "New Zealander builds Hobbit hole" will end up being the longest Tolkien thread of them all, with some of the best heartfelt content... Sorry John, but I would have rather it had been one with a more distinguished title!… post 252 - HairOfTheDog
However, I can still celebrate, with quiet dignity, the fact that what started as a laugh about some wacko in New Zealand has mutated and grown into a multifaceted discussion of the art, literature, and philosophy that is Tolkien. And now that I've managed to write the most pompous sentence of my entire life, I agree, Rosie… post 506 - JenB
Hah! I was number 1000!! (Elvish victory dance... wait, no; that would be too flitty) … post 1001 - BibChr
Real men don't have to be afraid of being flitty! Go for it. – post 1011 – HairOfTheDog
Seventeen years to research one mystical object seems a bit excessive… post 1007 - JenB
Okay...who's the wise guy who didn't renew Gandalf's research grant?… post 1024 – Overtaxed
To the very philosophical:
…Judas Iscariot obviously was a good man, or he wouldn't have been chosen to be one of the Apostles. He loved Jesus, like all of the Apostles, but he betrayed him. Yet without his betrayal, the Passion and Crucifixion would never have occurred, and mankind would not have been redeemed. So without his self-destruction infinite good would not have been accomplished. I certainly do not mean this to be irreverant but it seems to me that this describes the character of Gollum, in the scenes so movingly portrayed above… Lucius Cornelius Sulla
To fun but heartfelt debates about the integrity and worth of some of the characters…
…Anyone else notice how Boromir treats the hobbits? He's very fond of them but he seems to think of them as children - ruffling Frodo's hair, calls them all 'little ones'. He likes them, but I don't think he really respects them… post 1536 - JenB
Yes... Tolkien told us not to trust Boromir right off the bat when he began to laugh at Bilbo, until he realized that the Council obviously held this hobbit in high esteem. What a pompous dolt… post 1538 - HairOfTheDog
…I think almost every fault of his can be traced directly back to his blindness to anything spiritual or unseen. He considers the halflings as children, because that is what they look like. He considers the only hope of the ring to be in taking it and using it for a victory in the physical realm. He cannot see what the hobbits are truly made of, he cannot see the unseen hope of what the destruction of the ring might mean--the destruction of Sauron himself, and he cannot see the unseen danger that lies in the use of the ring itself… I just feel sorry for Boromir--he is like a blind but honorable man, trying to take the right path on the road but missing the right path entirely because he simply cannot see it… post 1548 - Penny1
Boromir isn't a jerk, he's a jock… post 2401 – Overtaxed
-----------------------------------------
Oh, I think by the time Frodo reaches the Cracks, he's not even himself anymore! I think he's not only on the brink of a dangerous place physically, he's on the brink of losing himself completely during the exchange with Gollum. But for some reason, the take-over isn't complete till he actually has to throw the Ring in. The person speaking to Gollum is not Frodo, but the "Wheel of Fire" that Sam sees. After the Ring is destroyed, Frodo not only comes back to himself, but comes back with the unbearable (to him) knowledge of what it's like to be completely without compassion. I think that's why it's so important to him to be compassionate in the Shire… post 2506 - 2Jedismom
…Regarding Frodo's compassion... it's a little too much at the end. Even Merry tells him that he's going to have to quit being so darn nice. But you're right. He's learned a lesson about evil that very few ever learn since it wasn't an external lesson but an internal one. (Those kinds of lessons have the greatest impact) Not only did he totally succumb to it, but he was rather ruthless to my little Smeagol… post 2516 - carton253
Well that Frodo was a big mean bully! (to Smeagol)… post 2519 – Overtaxed
So as you can see, everything JRR Tolkien (and Peter Jackson) is welcome here in our New Row, our soon-to-be familiar New Hobbit Hole…; philosophy, opinion, good talk and frequent silliness.
A lot to digest.
If I was certain that Iraq was complicit in the 9/11 attacks, then I would have no qualms with deposing Saddam. In fact, I'd wonder why we hadn't already done so.
I'll go back to reading.
Well, that explains the smell thing...
Go get 'em Smeags!
Lakes and rivers are good things too. I just get a little claustrophobic being more than 2-3 hours away from the ocean.
I know it's a little weird. But that's no surprise to anyone here...
President-God Kim Jong Il is cracked too. North Korea has nukes. What makes Iraq different?
or even better, kim chee pizza!
Mmmmm mmmmmmmmm!! Good fer what ails yuh...clears yer sinuses too...
I have a hard time trying to reconcile my faith with the fact that what I feel is "Kill 'em. Kill 'em all."
No, not all Muslims are bad people (although I do thing Islam is rooted in evil...deal with it Secretary Powell).
But I'll be a little more charitable when I hear the Muslim outcry, condemning terrorism.
never questioned that... I'm considerin' the source...
btw, when is your Christmas Cantata?...
I was mourning my own self-doubts, not any implied by you. I find myself torn between my protectiveness for my kids and my protectiveness of my country.
The likelyhood that WE would be their target.
Well, it's a little more than "Cantata." It sounds pretentious when I say this, but think "Broadway extravaganza."
Let me put it this way. When the church started this ministry about 20 years ago, they paid designers from Disney to come in for three weeks to teach them how to build the sets. I've done theater for years, and I've seen numerous Broadway shows. This is as professional as anything I've seen (I can say that 'cause they were doing it before we got there). For the first two weeks in December, our church is tranformed into a Broadway theater.
We have an adult cast of 200, then a youth choir (100+) and children's choir (100+). There are about 50 technical people behind the scenes (sets, props, lighting, flying the angels, etc.), then add about 100 ushers and 20-30 parking lot attendants. Well, anyway, it's a little more than "Cantata."
That said, we open in two weeks.
We have a preview performance on December 5, and open on December 6. We do four shows on Saturday, three on Sunday. Then the next week (December 12) we have shows on Thursday, Friday, Four on Saturday and two on Sunday.
Wanna come? It's very kid friendly this year. I can see if we still can get tickets. Let me know.
I am the one who said they will be defiant, dead Iraqis.
Then John Farson ripped it out of its context and suddenly everyone is justifying why that was said.
Now, I'll put it back in conflict.
I posted this the day the Iraqi Parliament voted to deny the UN Inspectors access to Iraq. They (the Parliment... for those who get lost using pronouns) said that they (again, the Iraqi parliament)were being defiant.
I posted the vote and commented that they (the Iraqi Parliament) are about to be dead, defiant Iraqis. I make no apology for that statement. Even if people ban me to Tooks Corner.
The context did not state the Iraqi people. It stated the leadership who are blindly leading Iraq into war.
Hope that clears it up.
None is needed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.