Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

No fed law explicitly restricts where distilling above a certain percentage may occur and bans it at home. The government position is that allowing home distillery would make it much harder to catch people selling untaxed spirits. The 5th circuit says that logic would allow the government to ban the home making of anything they wish to tax and is thus overreach. The 6th circuit basically says the feds have always taxed alcohol and prior to the home bans tax evasion was rampant thus it is not overreach to ban this specific activity.


33 posted on 10/19/2026 12:58:07 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


Some guy on YouTube who does medical videos claim the ban is in place to protect people from drinking methanol-contaminated liquor. I don’t think that’s the real reason at all, as it’s really about Uncle Sam wanting their share of the financial windfall.


34 posted on 10/19/2026 1:06:50 PM PDT by Arkansas Toothpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson