Sheriff Bianco's Perspective on the Riverside Election
Allegations of Voter Fraud
Sheriff Chad Bianco believes that there were allegations of voter fraud during the Riverside County election. He seized ballots to investigate these claims, which he felt warranted further scrutiny.
Basis for the Claims
Bianco's actions were prompted by concerns raised by local activists who suggested that the election results were inaccurate. However, local election officials have countered that these allegations stemmed from a misinterpretation of preliminary vote count data, indicating that the claims of fraud may not be substantiated.
The specific allegations of voter fraud in the Riverside election include claims that election workers inflated the vote count by over 45,000 votes during the November 2025 special election, which approved a redistricting proposal favoring Democrats. These claims were made by a local group, the Riverside Election Integrity Team, but were publicly refuted by the county's election officials, who explained the errors in the group's analysis.
Conclusion
While Sheriff Bianco maintains that there were legitimate concerns regarding the election's integrity, the official stance from local election authorities suggests that the basis for these concerns is flawed.
California is rotting from the head down.View the coming earthquakes, fires and floods as cleansing.
Has he had them long enough to have imaged them, or performed ANY kind of investigation?
The deep blue pols entrenched in Sacramento will do everything they can to protect vote fraud - and all other taxpayer fraud as well, including prosecuting those who uncover mass fraud:
“Gov. Gavin Newsom signed California’s controversial ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ into law which will suppress investigative journalism in the state.”
California Supreme Court Tells Sheriff Bianco To Give The Ballots Back
Bianco swore to protect and defend the Constitution which includes Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A), a penalty for states that rig the outcome of a vote, Section 2 trumping state law imo.
Excerpted from 14A:
Section 2 of 14A: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election [all emphases added] for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. [Apportionment of Representatives]
So California is arguably obstructing due process of Section 2-based federal oversight of possible voting fraud imo.
Is the California Elections Code section 15551 possibly unconstitutional in the context of Section 2?