Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: spintreebob

With vote anonymity built into the system, there is no way to do after-the-fact analysis. You can have precincts with more votes than registered voters, but there is no remedy except to disallow all votes from that precinct.

If there is no security on the front end there is no security in elections. The democRATs like no security.


28 posted on 09/13/2026 11:18:27 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

Many times in IL I had both R, D and LP sign affadavits that
a) They voted with no indication who they voted for
b) they voted and who they voted for
c) they did not vote.

Security on the front end means ground game preparation and ground game involvement.
d) I’ve had a Democrat precinct judge who was mad at the Ward committeeman...and my friend...prevent the precinct captain from voting on behalf of the no-shows.
e) Democrat precinct judge who had some sense of honesty request the Chicago Police to arrest the Democrat precinct captain for casting multiple votes on each machine at 5:50 am before the polls opened at 6 am.
(The Policeman refused. He said that he did not want to patrol the Chicago River, which I understood.)


29 posted on 09/13/2026 1:34:34 PM PDT by spintreebob (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson