[Williams]

And the life histories of the other jurors?

Is there even any logic to this?

How is he a villain with regard to his vote on the jury?

[SoCal Pubbie]

“Is there even any logic to this?

How is he a villain with regard to his vote on the jury?”

I think the idea is that he is a woman hating brute, who just wanted to see the bitch fry, while the other jurors were levelheaded, open-minded, and reasonable people. That’s what they’re selling.

[Ken H]

“Is there even any logic to this?”

---

Think about the woke agenda and you’ll have your answer, (which is “yes”).

[Cincinnatus.45-70]

“And the life histories of the other jurors?

“Is there even any logic to this?

“How is he a villain with regard to his vote on the jury?”

Here is their logic. He is a villain because a black man is required to take orders from white women quietly and say “Yassam, I’se do dat rat now, ma’am.”

[bobbo666]

He is a black man who did not vote like he was paid/told to do so. For that he must be destroyed.

He is gonna need a legal defense funded.

[Political Junkie Too]

The logic is that he was held up by the right as a person who stood his ground based on high moral convictions against the mob that wanted a nullification verdict for three brutal child murders.

Because he was held up as a role model for individualism, the LAAP-dog media had to attack him and try to take him out.

It's actually SOP for the media once they target a conservative-leaning person who becomes an emerging role model.

Only the left is allowed to have "influencers." Influencers on the right, like Charlie Kirk, James O'Keefe, Nick Shirley, and now this juror, cannot be allowed to continue - by any means necessary.

Remember when Obama made a campaign stop on some random street to mingle with the plebes during the 2008 election, and he stopped to chat with Joe "The Plumber" Wurzelbacher, and Wurzelbacher's simple question to Obama resulted in his "spread the wealth around" gaffe?

Well, that immediately led to a government administrator with Ohio's Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) illegally accessing his business license records and leaked it to the press.

Wurzelbacher sued over the breach for "emotional distress, harassment, and embarrassment as a result of the search." Naturally, the U.S. District Court in Columbus dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that the state database search did not amount to a constitutional violation of the right to privacy. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal.

The Ohio administator resigned her position.

-PJ