Anytime you move and moving gets you closer to an officer it’s walking up on them. Especially when you have an attitude that’s bigger than your IQ. He walked out of his door towards the officer, then when confronted he puffed up his chest and walked even closer. Why are you defending that looser? That’s the question you should ask yourself.
“Anytime you move and moving gets you closer to an officer it’s walking up on them. Especially when you have an attitude that’s bigger than your IQ.“
I think that’s the kind of response I wanted originally, troubling as it is. If the first sentence defined ”walking up on them” which you shouldn’t do, then you can’t pass them on the street or in an aisle at the grocery or exit the store if they are by the door, or approach them to report a crime or ask directions or tell them their fly is open, or much of anything. The second sentence is kind of subjective. I wonder how they write this into law.
“Why are you defending that looser?“
I don’t believe I defended him and I don’t disagree that he’s a “looser”, and probably his wife too.
At least you provided a better response to my original post.