Gunslingr3 wrote: “You can’t even acknowledge the principle. When I asked you what is was you evaded the question.”
I have provided an accurate description of the current law on privacy in public places which you continue to ignore.
I suggest you consult an actual attorney instead of relying upon your unfounded opinions of what the law should be.
Exactly.
You miss the point entirely.
It’s about TRACKING people and government agent access to that data without a warrant.
Not whether or not your picture can be snapped in public.
How can I get this to sink in for you when I can’t get you to even acknowledge what the Court has said?
You keep deliberately cutting it out of your replies and refusing to address it.
This is why I find you disingenuous and a fraud.
Good day, sir.