Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

“They chose instead the Marxist version, which divided men and women, pitted the sexes against each other, and created a protected class.”

Excellent observation. Well said! The post of the month!


11 posted on 09/03/2026 7:07:38 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Maine Mariner; MtnClimber; Tench_Coxe; rktman; dljordan; Migraine; Red Badger; kawhill; ...

It saddens me more than I can say to utter that truth.

God made men and women to need each other. Biology makes us that way. And psychologically we need each other.

But men and women have been rejecting marriage, because men have a harder and harder time finding women who will accept them for what they are, so men are simply staying away.

And women have raised their expectations so much that only a small percentage of the male population can meet them. So they don’t marry either, and when they do, it won’t work out.

A man and a woman together can be far more capable and powerful in the pursuit of happiness than most are capable of individually, because each sex brings to the table something that the other lacks. In other words, men and women can make each other a whole.

And Gloria Steinem, her excecrable feminist movement and the disrespectful and destructive “A Woman Needs a Man Like a Fish Needs a Bicycle” saying has sold women a bill of goods that is wholly false, and which was embraced by tens of millions of gullible, angry, and stupid women, has served its purpose of salting the fertile earth that should exist between men and women.

It saddens me and makes me angry.


29 posted on 09/03/2026 7:33:19 AM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson