There are 9 women on the jury. She’s walks and is celebrated as a feminist icon and goes on the view.
Not sure about that. As a mother who actually had post partum I cannot imagine killing my children. She be found guilty.
No men? Ridiculous.
Suffice it to say, at least in my opinion, that anyone who kills their kids, let alone one by one, is, in fact, sick or insane. I do believe that the Judge offered a way out for the “weak at heart” who just cannot bring themselves to convict someone, whether crazy or not, with a maximum penalty. I am guessing it will be either 2nd degree or manslaughter. The bigger question is why the press and non-liberals not focusing one bit on the kids.... they’re more interested in the drama of the crazed or not debate.
"Guilty of first-degree murder".
The longer period of deliberation indicates a problem with that.
I agree with you that the defendant will escape a "guilty" verdict. She will get a "not guilty by reason of insanity" verdict, or possibly a hung jury and a retrial.
There should be no women on the jury. We have a poisoned culture where no female defendant can ever be found guilty of anything due to feminist influence on jury pools.
Well, not quite. She paralyzed herself from the waist down when she jumped from a second story window after strangling all three children. She might roll with it...
That pool should have been thrown out.
How do you end up with a jury entirely made up of women?
Yeah I have ZERO faith in a jury in Commiechusetts..these women after all all meet up at the No Kings protests..they see Lindsay Clancy as a hero who “My Body My Choice” slaughtered her children, instead of the womb she did it when they were already born..Clancy is no different than Diane Downs, but in commies minds Diane Downs is a hero too