Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

They definitely need to require a specific and VALID JUDICIAL WARRANT for ANYONE to access Flock databases
……………………………………………………………………………….
I don’t know... I haven’t given too much thought to the specifics of flock cameras, but...

There is no expectation of privacy in public places
****************************************************

True. But I would like to see ACCESS to the data RESTRICTED to official business and metadata kept on all searches that can reveal WHO searched, for WHAT they searched and WHEN each search was conducted. That would help minimize abuse of the data (e.g., ex-boyfriends tracking an ex-girlfriend, STALKERS tracking movements of a “target”) and have a searchable record of the stalking/abuse.


81 posted on 08/21/2026 5:42:11 PM PDT by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: House Atreides
I agree with that, but not through the courts like with a warrant. That's why I suggested a senior officer in the PD precinct, like the captain. Then, if there is a violation it becomes an internal affairs investigation into both of them.

-PJ

85 posted on 08/21/2026 6:05:28 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson