[Gunslingr3]

You didn't read 'the rest of the story'.

I read all of your AI slop. None of disputes the most pertinent part that you posted from it:

International observers, including the OSCE, largely declared the 2010 election to be fair, transparent, and democratic.

Your regurgitation of post-hoc, neocon talking points doesn't dispute the fact the election was contemporaneously considered "fair, transparent, and democratic."

I also noticed you didn't touch on the fact that the Rada did not have enough votes to remove the President under the Ukrainian constitution.

But I can't ask you how you'd consider the same situation were it to happen here, because you've made it clear that critical thinking isn't your forte.

If I posed a hypothetical situation to one of my staff and they responded they 'don't do hypotheticals' I'd fire that idiot on the spot.

[adorno]

I read all of your AI slop.

Wanting to be in denial of the truth is the reason you are so ignorant.

None of disputes the most pertinent part that you posted from it:

The AI input and my comments, debunk what YOU think is pertinent.

International observers, including the OSCE, largely declared the 2010 election to be fair, transparent, and democratic.

International observes, basically people contracted to approve the results, regardless of what transpired during the election. And not capable of seeing how the election results were as a result of Russian/Putin intervention.

Notice the weasel word, "largely"; no explanation about what what means. Heck, I 'largely' approve of what Putin does inside his country, though I have no idea what it is that he does.

Read all of my posts and don't be dismissive of the content because some of it came from other sources. Everything on the internet is 'other sources' and they are all scoured for the answers being sought. You need to learn how to use AI, because, you might actually learn something and won't be duped solely by what others say, like Putin.