I’m saying that wearing a sweatshirt that says “Pure Blood” is like Platner’s tatoo. One cannot use Nazi symbolism to describe oneself and not expect to be considered a Nazi.
/
So, American Indians wearing “ proud pure blood “ tshirts are justifiably to be considered Nazis ?
Your mind is foul, slanted and a rotted result of prog ideology.
You, cannot sling your prog opinion without expecting us to point out your sides myopia.
The DSA DOES share socialism with the Nazis , so if you’re sniffing out Nazis and those that you believe you can find a reason to label nazis ,,, start there and quit humping our pure blood legs please.
Spit
cuz1961 wrote: “You, cannot sling your prog opinion without expecting us to point out your sides myopia. The DSA DOES share socialism with the Nazis , so if you’re sniffing out Nazis and those that you believe you can find a reason to label nazis ,,, start there and quit humping our pure blood legs please”
First of all, they are not ‘my side’.
Second, how does having a Nazi tatoo differ from wearing a sweatshirt with Nazi rhetoric?
Third, are you familiar with what JK Rowling said about those who call themselves ‘Pure Bloods’?