To: foldspace
Ooh struck a nerve.
Circumstantial evidence can be inferred from the whole scene man. You believe her because you want to.
This whole thread over the years has been about revealing what is behind the facade.
She was wholeheartedly part of the cabal of evil.
3,557 posted on
08/27/2026 7:24:20 AM PDT by
eldoradude
(Think for yourself...)
To: All; eldoradude; ransomnote; dolly; pardon
Ooh struck a nerve.
Nope. Just a 'lil morsel to ambush.
This whole thread over the years has been about revealing what is behind the facade.
Only with Q-level coded guidance, evidence, and mathematically impossible odds, not bullshit.
She was wholeheartedly part of the cabal of evil.
With that conclusion based on your original false accusation(s), I guess we all are.
You have some nerve,
depositing every unproven suspicion,
old tabloid smear,
and conspiracy framework onto a woman who spent seven decades denying a romantic relationship with her childhood friend
while remaining married to the same man until his death.
Circumstantial closeness is not proof of a sexual relationship. Dolly and Judy met as children, stayed friends for seventy years, worked together, shared rooms on the road the way many touring musicians and staff did, and Dolly repeatedly said they were never lovers. She said it in interviews, in her memoir, and on camera.
Judy dated men. Treating that documented record as a “facade” because it does not fit a preferred theory is not inference. It is refusal to accept the simplest explanation: an unusually close platonic friendship that some people find hard to believe.
You calling her “wholeheartedly part of the cabal of evil” after her death is not analysis.
It is a habit of collapsing a complicated public life—Pentecostal upbringing, country stardom, philanthropy, gay-rights support, private marriage—into a single villain story.
That habit usually says more about the accuser’s need for a totalizing enemy than about the person being accused.
You can dislike her politics, her image, or her industry. You cannot turn decades of consistent statements, a long marriage, and a public record of friendship into secret lesbian cabal membership by declaring that everyone who takes her at her word is just “wanting to believe.”
That is not evidence.
That is YOUR projection dressed as insight.
You have not 'touched a nerve'; I simply stand on evidence, and your lack thereof.
And yes, I've seen the 'six degrees of separation' attacks on Dolly Pardoned.
She's gone now, you missed the attack windows. It's too late. She is loved. She's with God. HE will sort it out. God bless her.
Have a nice day!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson